From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753534AbZFXGp1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:45:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752456AbZFXGpS (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:45:18 -0400 Received: from www84.your-server.de ([213.133.104.84]:59516 "EHLO www84.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751683AbZFXGpR (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:45:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [merged] proctxt-update-kernel-filesystem-proctxt-documentation.patch removed from -mm tree From: Stefani Seibold To: Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20090623233247.7ed661b7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200906182243.n5IMhwuV003008@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <1245824444.22613.3.camel@wall-e> <20090623233247.7ed661b7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:45:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1245825903.23818.4.camel@wall-e> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: stefani@seibold.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2009, 23:32 -0700 schrieb Andrew Morton: > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:20:44 +0200 Stefani Seibold wrote: > > > what is with the associated > > procfs-provide-stack-information-for-threads-v08.patch > > patch? > > > > There was no real objections against this patch, so why not merge it for > > 2.6.31? > > Alexey pointed out that it doesn't actually work. That is not true... it works. With my patch the kernel does exactly know where the thread stack is and therefor it is easy to determinate the associated map.