From: Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + proc-connector-add-event-for-process-becoming-session-leader.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:53:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245833631.3280.0.camel@wing-commander> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090623202937.GA31252@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1106 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:29 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > The act of a process becoming a session leader is a useful signal to a
> > supervising init daemon such as Upstart.
> ...
> > @@ -360,8 +360,10 @@ void __set_special_pids(struct pid *pid)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *curr = current->group_leader;
> >
> > - if (task_session(curr) != pid)
> > + if (task_session(curr) != pid) {
> > change_pid(curr, PIDTYPE_SID, pid);
> > + proc_sid_connector(curr);
> > + }
>
> Wouldn't it better to change sys_setsid() then? This looks more clear
> imho, and we can move proc_sid_connector() outside of tasklist_lock.
>
> Note also that __set_special_pids() does not neccessary mean we are
> becoming a session leader, see daemonize().
>
Actually, I specifically wanted to receive this event if the process
called daemonize() which is why this is done here rather than in
sys_setsid()
The new session is important information to init in figuring out what
the process is up to (ie, fork(), setsid(), fork() = daemonise)
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@ubuntu.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 20:29 + proc-connector-add-event-for-process-becoming-session-leader.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-24 8:53 ` Scott James Remnant [this message]
2009-06-24 14:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245833631.3280.0.camel@wing-commander \
--to=scott@ubuntu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox