From: tom.leiming@gmail.com
To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@elte.hu, Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:04:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246201486-7308-2-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246201486-7308-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Currently lockdep will print the 1st circle detected if it exists when
acquiring a new (next) lock.
This patch prints the shortest path from the next lock to be acquired to
the previous held lock if a circle is found.
The patch still uses the current method to check circle, and once the
circle is found, breadth-first search algorithem is used to compute the
shortest path from the next lock to the previous lock in the forward
lock dependency graph.
Printing the shortest path will shorten the dependency chain, and make
troubleshooting for possible circular locking easier.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 6 ++
kernel/lockdep.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/lockdep_internals.h | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index b25d1b5..9ec026f 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -149,6 +149,12 @@ struct lock_list {
struct lock_class *class;
struct stack_trace trace;
int distance;
+
+ /*The parent field is used to implement breadth-first search,and
+ *the bit 0 is reused to indicate if the lock has been accessed
+ *in BFS.
+ */
+ struct lock_list *parent;
};
/*
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 8bbeef9..93dc70d 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -897,6 +897,79 @@ static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_class *class, struct lock_class *this,
return 1;
}
+static struct circular_queue lock_cq;
+static int __search_shortest_path(struct lock_list *source_entry,
+ struct lock_class *target,
+ struct lock_list **target_entry,
+ int forward)
+{
+ struct lock_list *entry;
+ struct circular_queue *cq = &lock_cq;
+ int ret = 1;
+
+ __cq_init(cq);
+
+ mark_lock_accessed(source_entry, NULL);
+ if (source_entry->class == target) {
+ *target_entry = source_entry;
+ ret = 0;
+ goto exit;
+ }
+
+ __cq_enqueue(cq, (unsigned long)source_entry);
+
+ while (!__cq_empty(cq)) {
+ struct lock_list *lock;
+ struct list_head *head;
+
+ __cq_dequeue(cq, (unsigned long *)&lock);
+
+ if (!lock->class) {
+ ret = -2;
+ goto exit;
+ }
+
+ if (forward)
+ head = &lock->class->locks_after;
+ else
+ head = &lock->class->locks_before;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(entry, head, entry) {
+ if (!lock_accessed(entry)) {
+ mark_lock_accessed(entry, lock);
+ if (entry->class == target) {
+ *target_entry = entry;
+ ret = 0;
+ goto exit;
+ }
+
+ if (__cq_enqueue(cq, (unsigned long)entry)) {
+ ret = -1;
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+exit:
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline int __search_forward_shortest_path(struct lock_list *src_entry,
+ struct lock_class *target,
+ struct lock_list **target_entry)
+{
+ return __search_shortest_path(src_entry, target, target_entry, 1);
+
+}
+
+static inline int __search_backward_shortest_path(struct lock_list *src_entry,
+ struct lock_class *target,
+ struct lock_list **target_entry)
+{
+ return __search_shortest_path(src_entry, target, target_entry, 0);
+
+}
+
/*
* Recursive, forwards-direction lock-dependency checking, used for
* both noncyclic checking and for hardirq-unsafe/softirq-unsafe
@@ -934,7 +1007,7 @@ print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
- if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
+ if (debug_locks_silent)
return 0;
printk("\n=======================================================\n");
@@ -954,19 +1027,41 @@ print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth)
return 0;
}
-static noinline int print_circular_bug_tail(void)
+static noinline int print_circular_bug(void)
{
struct task_struct *curr = current;
struct lock_list this;
+ struct lock_list *target;
+ struct lock_list *parent;
+ int result;
+ unsigned long depth;
- if (debug_locks_silent)
+ if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
return 0;
this.class = hlock_class(check_source);
if (!save_trace(&this.trace))
return 0;
- print_circular_bug_entry(&this, 0);
+ result = __search_forward_shortest_path(&this,
+ hlock_class(check_target),
+ &target);
+ if (result) {
+ printk("\n%s:search shortest path failed:%d\n", __func__,
+ result);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ depth = get_lock_depth(target);
+
+ print_circular_bug_header(target, depth);
+
+ parent = get_lock_parent(target);
+
+ while (parent) {
+ print_circular_bug_entry(parent, --depth);
+ parent = get_lock_parent(parent);
+ }
printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
@@ -1072,14 +1167,15 @@ check_noncircular(struct lock_class *source, unsigned int depth)
*/
list_for_each_entry(entry, &source->locks_after, entry) {
if (entry->class == hlock_class(check_target))
- return print_circular_bug_header(entry, depth+1);
+ return 2;
debug_atomic_inc(&nr_cyclic_checks);
- if (!check_noncircular(entry->class, depth+1))
- return print_circular_bug_entry(entry, depth+1);
+ if (check_noncircular(entry->class, depth+1) == 2)
+ return 2;
}
return 1;
}
+
#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
/*
* Forwards and backwards subgraph searching, for the purposes of
@@ -1484,8 +1580,9 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
*/
check_source = next;
check_target = prev;
- if (!(check_noncircular(hlock_class(next), 0)))
- return print_circular_bug_tail();
+ if (check_noncircular(hlock_class(next), 0) == 2)
+ return print_circular_bug();
+
if (!check_prev_add_irq(curr, prev, next))
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
index 699a2ac..6f48d37 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
+++ b/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
@@ -136,3 +136,86 @@ extern atomic_t nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions;
# define debug_atomic_dec(ptr) do { } while (0)
# define debug_atomic_read(ptr) 0
#endif
+
+/* The circular_queue and helpers is used to implement the
+ * breadth-first search(BFS)algorithem, by which we can build
+ * the shortest path from the next lock to be acquired to the
+ * previous held lock if there is a circular between them.
+ * */
+#define MAX_CIRCULAR_QUE_SIZE 4096UL
+struct circular_queue{
+ unsigned long element[MAX_CIRCULAR_QUE_SIZE];
+ unsigned int front, rear;
+};
+
+#define LOCK_ACCESSED 1UL
+#define LOCK_ACCESSED_MASK (~LOCK_ACCESSED)
+
+static inline void __cq_init(struct circular_queue *cq)
+{
+ cq->front = cq->rear = 0;
+}
+
+static inline int __cq_empty(struct circular_queue *cq)
+{
+ return (cq->front == cq->rear);
+}
+
+static inline int __cq_full(struct circular_queue *cq)
+{
+ return ((cq->rear + 1)%MAX_CIRCULAR_QUE_SIZE) == cq->front;
+}
+
+static inline int __cq_enqueue(struct circular_queue *cq, unsigned long elem)
+{
+ if (__cq_full(cq))
+ return -1;
+
+ cq->element[cq->rear] = elem;
+ cq->rear = (cq->rear + 1)%MAX_CIRCULAR_QUE_SIZE;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int __cq_dequeue(struct circular_queue *cq, unsigned long *elem)
+{
+ if (__cq_empty(cq))
+ return -1;
+
+ *elem = cq->element[cq->front];
+ cq->front = (cq->front + 1)%MAX_CIRCULAR_QUE_SIZE;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int __cq_get_elem_count(struct circular_queue *cq)
+{
+ return (cq->rear - cq->front)%MAX_CIRCULAR_QUE_SIZE;
+}
+
+static inline void mark_lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock,
+ struct lock_list *parent)
+{
+ lock->parent = (void *) parent + LOCK_ACCESSED;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock)
+{
+ return (unsigned long)lock->parent & LOCK_ACCESSED;
+}
+
+static inline struct lock_list *get_lock_parent(struct lock_list *child)
+{
+ return (struct lock_list *)
+ ((unsigned long)child->parent & LOCK_ACCESSED_MASK);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long get_lock_depth(struct lock_list *child)
+{
+ unsigned long depth = 0;
+ struct lock_list *parent;
+
+ while ((parent = get_lock_parent(child))) {
+ child = parent;
+ depth++;
+ }
+ return depth;
+}
--
1.6.0.GIT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-28 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-28 15:04 [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` tom.leiming [this message]
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 02/11] kernel:lockdep:improve implementation of BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 03/11] kernel:lockdep: introduce match function to BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 05/11] kernel:lockdep:implement find_usage_*wards " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 06/11] kernel:lockdep:introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 07/11] kernel:lockdep: implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 08/11] kernel:lockdep: update memory usage introduced " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/11] kernel:lockdep:add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 10/11] BFS cleanup tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 11/11] kernel:lockdep:fix return value of check_usage*() tom.leiming
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: BFS cleanup tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:03 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:03 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Update memory usage introduced by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement find_usage_*wards by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-13 8:02 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() " Dave Young
2009-07-13 8:08 ` Dave Young
2009-07-21 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce match function to BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Improve implementation of BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:30 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12 2:42 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 7:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-13 13:56 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 13:51 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 9:01 ` Dave Young
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Print " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11 0:43 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-11 3:25 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12 2:29 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 4:39 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16 5:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 7:12 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246201486-7308-2-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox