From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Luming Yu <luming.yu@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] Use IPI_shortcut for lapic timer broadcast
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:34:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246307644.4534.26298.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3877989d0906282347i311eb14bp80a7c80878219c31@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 23:47 -0700, Luming Yu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We need to use IPI shortcut to send lapic timer broadcast
> to avoid the latency of sending IPI one bye one on systems with many
> logical processors when NO_HZ is disabled.
> Without this patch,I have seen upstream kernel with RHEL 5 kernel
> config boot hang .
>
> The patch also changes physflat_send_IPI_all to IPI shortcut mode.
>
> Please review, and apply.
>
> **The patch is enclosed in text attachment*
> **Using web client to send the patch* *
> **below is for review, please apply attached patch*/
>
> Thanks,
> Luming
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Luming <luming.yu@intel.com>
>
> apic.c | 4 +++-
> apic_flat_64.c | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.30-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c.0 2009-06-28
> 20:22:55.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6.30-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c 2009-06-29
> 00:21:44.000000000 -0600
> @@ -419,7 +419,9 @@
> static void lapic_timer_broadcast(const struct cpumask *mask)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - apic->send_IPI_mask(mask, LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR);
> + if (cpus_empty(*mask))
> + return;
> + apic->send_IPI_all(LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR);
> #endif
> }
>
Hmm.. this change looks wrong. This will cause unnecessary timer
broadcasts when nohz is actually enabled. I mean, when nohz is enabled,
we want to send this interrupt broadcast to one or some subset of CPUs
and this change sends the interrupt to all CPUs.
On a 16 logical CPUs with nohz enabled, powertop without this patch I
see
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 11.6 interval: 15.0s
and with this patch I see
Wakeups-from-idle per second : 24.7 interval: 15.0s
Also, cat /proc/interrupts | grep LOC shows this problem where all CPUs
seem to get roughly same number of local APIC interrupts over a period
of time with this patch.
We should only do the allbutself when nohz is disabled with a big
unlikely() around that code.
Thanks,
Venki
> --- linux-2.6.30-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c.0 2009-06-29
> 00:13:26.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6.30-rc6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c 2009-06-29
> 00:11:23.000000000 -0600
> @@ -274,7 +274,12 @@
>
> static void physflat_send_IPI_all(int vector)
> {
> - physflat_send_IPI_mask(cpu_online_mask, vector);
> + if (vector == NMI_VECTOR) {
> + physflat_send_IPI_mask(cpu_online_mask, vector);
> + } else {
> + __default_send_IPI_shortcut(APIC_DEST_ALLINC,
> + vector, apic->dest_logical);
> + }
> }
>
> static unsigned int physflat_cpu_mask_to_apicid(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-29 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-29 6:47 [RFC patch] Use IPI_shortcut for lapic timer broadcast Luming Yu
2009-06-29 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 8:04 ` Luming Yu
2009-06-29 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 8:21 ` Luming Yu
2009-06-29 8:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 8:43 ` Luming Yu
2009-06-29 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-29 14:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-29 20:34 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh [this message]
2009-06-30 7:01 ` Luming Yu
2009-07-03 0:23 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-07-03 2:04 ` Luming Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246307644.4534.26298.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luming.yu@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox