From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:08:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246606736.2322.9.camel@jaswinder.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246527872.13659.2.camel@hpdv5.satnam>
Hello Ingo,
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 15:14 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> This output is from AMD box:
>
> $ ./perf stat -e add -e multiply -e divide -e vec-idle-cycles -e vec-stall-cycles -e vec-ops -- ls -lR /usr/include/ > /dev/null
>
> Performance counter stats for 'ls -lR /usr/include/':
>
> 4218 vec-adds (scaled from 66.60%)
> 7426 vec-muls (scaled from 66.67%)
> 5441 vec-divs (scaled from 66.29%)
> 821982187 vec-idle-cycles (scaled from 66.45%)
> 2681 vec-stall-cycles (scaled from 67.11%)
> 7887 vec-ops (scaled from 66.88%)
>
> 0.417614573 seconds time elapsed
>
> $ ./perf stat -e add -e multiply -e divide -e vec-idle-cycles -e vec-stall-cycles -e vec-ops -- /usr/bin/rhythmbox ~jaswinder/Music/singhiskinng.mp3
>
> Performance counter stats for '/usr/bin/rhythmbox /home/jaswinder/Music/singhiskinng.mp3':
>
> 17552264 vec-adds (scaled from 66.28%)
> 19715258 vec-muls (scaled from 66.63%)
> 15862733 vec-divs (scaled from 66.82%)
> 23735187095 vec-idle-cycles (scaled from 66.89%)
> 11353159 vec-stall-cycles (scaled from 66.90%)
> 36628571 vec-ops (scaled from 66.48%)
>
> 298.350012843 seconds time elapsed
>
> $ ./perf stat -e add -e multiply -e divide -e vec-idle-cycles -e vec-stall-cycles -e vec-ops -- /usr/bin/vlc ~jaswinder/Videos/Linus_Torvalds_interview_with_Charlie_Rose_Part_1.flv
>
> Performance counter stats for '/usr/bin/vlc /home/jaswinder/Videos/Linus_Torvalds_interview_with_Charlie_Rose_Part_1.flv':
>
> 20177177044 vec-adds (scaled from 66.63%)
> 34101687027 vec-muls (scaled from 66.64%)
> 3984060862 vec-divs (scaled from 66.71%)
> 26349684710 vec-idle-cycles (scaled from 66.65%)
> 9052001905 vec-stall-cycles (scaled from 66.66%)
> 76440734242 vec-ops (scaled from 66.71%)
>
> 272.523058097 seconds time elapsed
>
> $ ./perf list shows vector events like :
>
> vec-adds OR add [Hardware vector event]
> vec-muls OR multiply [Hardware vector event]
> vec-divs OR divide [Hardware vector event]
> vec-idle-cycles OR vec-empty-cycles [Hardware vector event]
> vec-stall-cycles OR vec-busy-cycles [Hardware vector event]
> vec-ops OR vec-operations [Hardware vector event]
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/perf_counter.h | 15 ++++++++++
> kernel/perf_counter.c | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> index 36c3dc7..48f28b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,22 @@ static const u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
> },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Generalized hw vectored co-processor event table
> + */
> +
> +static u64 __read_mostly hw_vector_event_ids[PERF_COUNT_HW_VECTOR_MAX];
> +
> +static const u64 nehalem_hw_vector_event_ids[] =
> +{
> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_VECTOR_ADD] = 0x01B1, /* UOPS_EXECUTED.PORT0 */
> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_VECTOR_MULTIPLY] = 0x0214, /* ARITH.MUL */
> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_VECTOR_DIVIDE] = 0x0114, /* ARITH.CYCLES_DIV_BUSY */
> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_VECTOR_IDLE_CYCLES] = 0x0,
> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_VECTOR_STALL_CYCLES] = 0x60A2, /* RESOURCE_STALLS.FPCW|MXCSR*/
> + [PERF_COUNT_HW_VECTOR_OPS] = 0x0710, /* FP_COMP_OPS_EXE.X87|MMX|SSE_FP*/
> +};
> +
Have you tested this patch on Intel Corei7/Nehalem.
Thanks,
--
JSR
http://userweb.kernel.org/~jaswinder/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-03 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 9:33 [GIT-PULL -tip][PATCH 0/6] perf_counter patches Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:35 ` [PATCH 1/6 -tip] perf stat: define MATCH_EVENT for easy attrs checking Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/6 -tip] perf stat: treat same behaviour for all CYCLES and CLOCKS Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:37 ` [PATCH 3/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:38 ` [PATCH 4/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware interrupt " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:38 ` [PATCH 5/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add hardware vector events for nehalem Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:40 ` [PATCH 6/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add hardware interrupt events for nehalem, core2 and atom Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware interrupt support for AMD Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:01 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-04 14:17 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-05 1:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-05 4:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-05 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-05 9:01 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-05 9:55 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:20 ` [PATCH 3/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware vectored co-processor " Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 11:40 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-02 9:44 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-02 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware interrupt support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem, Core2 and Atom Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 7:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-07-03 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 10:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/3 -tip] perf list: avoid replicating functions Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 11:55 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 12:49 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 13:25 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-04 14:05 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-04 13:54 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:39 ` [PATCH 2/6 -tip] perf stat: treat same behaviour for all CYCLES and CLOCKS Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 8:18 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-07-03 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 11:30 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf stat: Define MATCH_EVENT for easy attr checking tip-bot for Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:45 ` [GIT-PULL -tip][PATCH 0/6] perf_counter patches Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246606736.2322.9.camel@jaswinder.satnam \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox