From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Anton Blanchard" <anton@samba.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware interrupt support for AMD
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:31:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246784498.2467.10.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090705080459.GA11636@elte.hu>
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 10:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I'm simply not going to apply patches from you for what i consider a
> half-done feature.
>
This is not half-done. There are only 3 hardware interrupt performance
counter events in Intel and AMD. And I supported all of them.
I also supported all relevant Intel models and all AMD models.
You are requesting for software counter for hardirqs, I have no problem
to support it, I have also plan to add exceptions through software
counters, but again it will be different patch. And there is no point of
blocking this patch, as this will never change even if you add software
counters.
And you not even telling the problem in this patch, but you want to add
more stuff, which is independent of this.
So it is time to reconsider your consideration.
Thanks,
--
JSR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-05 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 9:33 [GIT-PULL -tip][PATCH 0/6] perf_counter patches Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:35 ` [PATCH 1/6 -tip] perf stat: define MATCH_EVENT for easy attrs checking Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:36 ` [PATCH 2/6 -tip] perf stat: treat same behaviour for all CYCLES and CLOCKS Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:37 ` [PATCH 3/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:38 ` [PATCH 4/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware interrupt " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:38 ` [PATCH 5/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add hardware vector events for nehalem Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 9:40 ` [PATCH 6/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add hardware interrupt events for nehalem, core2 and atom Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:24 ` [PATCH 4/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware interrupt support for AMD Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 12:01 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 10:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-04 14:17 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-05 1:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-05 4:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-05 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-05 9:01 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-07-05 9:55 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:20 ` [PATCH 3/6 -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware vectored co-processor " Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 11:40 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-02 9:44 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-02 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware interrupt support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem, Core2 and Atom Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 10:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/3 -tip] perf list: avoid replicating functions Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/2 -tip] perf_counter: Add generalized hardware vectored co-processor support for AMD and Intel Corei7/Nehalem Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 11:55 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 12:49 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-03 13:25 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-04 14:05 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-04 9:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-04 13:54 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:39 ` [PATCH 2/6 -tip] perf stat: treat same behaviour for all CYCLES and CLOCKS Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03 8:18 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-07-03 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 11:30 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf stat: Define MATCH_EVENT for easy attr checking tip-bot for Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-01 11:45 ` [GIT-PULL -tip][PATCH 0/6] perf_counter patches Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246784498.2467.10.camel@ht.satnam \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox