From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Drop the need_resched() loop from cond_resched()
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:00:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247238045.7529.44.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247237391-5352-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 16:49 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The schedule() function is a loop that reschedules the current task
> while the TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag is set:
>
> void schedule(void)
> {
> need_resched:
> /* schedule code */
> if (need_resched())
> goto need_resched;
> }
>
> And cond_resched() repeat this loop:
>
> do {
> add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> schedule();
> sub_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> } while(need_resched());
>
> This loop is needless because schedule() already did the check and
> nothing can set TIF_NEED_RESCHED between schedule() exit and the loop
> check in need_resched().
>
> Then remove this needless loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 4d1e387..87ecac1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -6613,11 +6613,9 @@ static void __cond_resched(void)
> * PREEMPT_ACTIVE, which could trigger a second
> * cond_resched() call.
> */
> - do {
> - add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> - schedule();
> - sub_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> - } while (need_resched());
> + add_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> + schedule();
> + sub_preempt_count(PREEMPT_ACTIVE);
> }
>
> int __sched _cond_resched(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-10 14:49 [PATCH 1/2] sched: Drop the need_resched() loop from cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 14:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Move the sleeping while atomic checks early in cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 15:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-10 17:14 ` [PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 18:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 18:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-10 18:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-10 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Drop the need_resched() loop from cond_resched() Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-10 15:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 15:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-07-10 15:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 16:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-10 16:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-10 17:23 ` [PATCH] sched: Remove obsolete comment in __cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247238045.7529.44.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox