From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc2+: Interrupts enabled after cpufreq_suspend
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:23:37 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247264617.21776.6.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090710192511.GB6240@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:25 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> The answer seems to be in 42d4dc3f4e1ec1396371aac89d0dccfdd977191b
> which introduced all this code to work around some failure that only happens
> on PPC...
>
> [PATCH] Add suspend method to cpufreq core
>
> In order to properly fix some issues with cpufreq vs. sleep on
> PowerBooks, I had to add a suspend callback to the pmac_cpufreq driver.
> I must force a switch to full speed before sleep and I switch back to
> previous speed on resume.
>
>
> Ben, is there something better we can do here ?
>
> I really don't want to add an #ifdef __powerpc__ to core code if we can help it.
> I'd rather we didn't call into driver guts at all from the suspend path.
Wait a minute ... having a suspend/resume method in cpufreq is one
thing, having it muck around with SMP is another :-) The ppc code
doesn't do that.
There's nothing fundamentally "fail" in requiring a switch to a given
frequency before suspend. I don't know what kind of major FAIL the K8
code is doing here though :-)
I'm happy instead of #ifdef's however to push the logic into the ppc
driver, or use a flag that the ppc driver sets to enable that logic.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-09 15:44 2.6.31-rc2+: Interrupts enabled after cpufreq_suspend Marcin Slusarz
2009-07-10 19:25 ` Dave Jones
2009-07-10 20:13 ` Dave Jones
2009-07-11 14:33 ` Marcin Slusarz
2009-07-10 22:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-07-10 23:46 ` Dave Jones
2009-07-16 3:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247264617.21776.6.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox