From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Cc: nauman@google.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cfq-iosched: Do not disable idling for seeky processes if "fairness" is set
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:57:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247425030-25344-3-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247425030-25344-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
o CFQ provides fair access to disk in terms of disk time used to processes.
Fairness is provided for the applications which have their think time with
in slice_idle (8ms default) limit.
o CFQ currently disables idling for seeky processes. So even if a process
has think time with-in slice_idle limits, it will still not get fair share
of disk. Disabling idling for a seeky process seems good from throughput
perspective but not necessarily from fairness perspecitve.
0 Do not disable idling based on seek pattern of process if a user has set
/sys/block/<disk>/queue/iosched/fairness = 1.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 658ea7b..9de8046 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -1964,7 +1964,7 @@ cfq_update_idle_window(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
enable_idle = old_idle = cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq);
if (!atomic_read(&cic->ioc->nr_tasks) || !cfqd->cfq_slice_idle ||
- (cfqd->hw_tag && CIC_SEEKY(cic)))
+ (!cfqd->cfq_fairness && cfqd->hw_tag && CIC_SEEKY(cic)))
enable_idle = 0;
else if (sample_valid(cic->ttime_samples)) {
if (cic->ttime_mean > cfqd->cfq_slice_idle)
--
1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-12 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-12 18:57 [RFC] Improve CFQ fairness Vivek Goyal
2009-07-12 18:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] cfq-iosched: Introduce an ioscheduler tunable "fairness" Vivek Goyal
2009-07-12 18:57 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-07-13 21:19 ` [RFC] Improve CFQ fairness Divyesh Shah
2009-07-13 21:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-09-03 17:10 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-09-04 17:36 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247425030-25344-3-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox