From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:14:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247476498.7529.54.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090713070110.GA28499@elte.hu>
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 09:01 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> It's a nice byproduct, beyond the primary advantage of not being a
> stack based recursion check.
>
> I think this patch-set is great, and there's just one more step
> needed to make it round: it would be nice to remove the limitation
> of maximum number of locks held per task. (MAX_LOCK_DEPTH)
>
> The way we could do it is to split out this bit of struct task:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
> u64 curr_chain_key;
> int lockdep_depth;
> unsigned int lockdep_recursion;
> struct held_lock held_locks[MAX_LOCK_DEPTH];
> gfp_t lockdep_reclaim_gfp;
> #endif
>
> into a separate 'struct lockdep_state' structure, and allocate it
> dynamically during fork with a initial pre-set size of say 64 locks
> depth. If we hit that limit, we'd double the allocation threshold,
> which would cause a larger structure to be allocated for all newly
> allocated tasks.
Right, except allocating stuff while in the middle of lockdep is very
hard since it involves taking more locks :-)
I've tried it several times but never quite managed it in a way that I
felt comfortable with.
It would require having a reserve and serializing over that reserve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-13 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-28 15:04 [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 02/11] kernel:lockdep:improve implementation of BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 03/11] kernel:lockdep: introduce match function to BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 05/11] kernel:lockdep:implement find_usage_*wards " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 06/11] kernel:lockdep:introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 07/11] kernel:lockdep: implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 08/11] kernel:lockdep: update memory usage introduced " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/11] kernel:lockdep:add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 10/11] BFS cleanup tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 11/11] kernel:lockdep:fix return value of check_usage*() tom.leiming
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: BFS cleanup tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:03 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:03 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Update memory usage introduced by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 17:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement find_usage_*wards by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-13 8:02 ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() " Dave Young
2009-07-13 8:08 ` Dave Young
2009-07-21 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce match function to BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Improve implementation of BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:30 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12 2:42 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 7:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-13 13:56 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 13:51 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 9:01 ` Dave Young
2009-07-18 14:23 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Print " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11 0:43 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-11 3:25 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12 2:29 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 4:39 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16 5:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 7:12 ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16 9:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247476498.7529.54.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox