public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:14:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247476498.7529.54.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090713070110.GA28499@elte.hu>

On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 09:01 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> It's a nice byproduct, beyond the primary advantage of not being a 
> stack based recursion check.
> 
> I think this patch-set is great, and there's just one more step 
> needed to make it round: it would be nice to remove the limitation 
> of maximum number of locks held per task. (MAX_LOCK_DEPTH)
> 
> The way we could do it is to split out this bit of struct task:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> # define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 48UL
>         u64 curr_chain_key;
>         int lockdep_depth;
>         unsigned int lockdep_recursion;
>         struct held_lock held_locks[MAX_LOCK_DEPTH];
>         gfp_t lockdep_reclaim_gfp;
> #endif
> 
> into a separate 'struct lockdep_state' structure, and allocate it 
> dynamically during fork with a initial pre-set size of say 64 locks 
> depth. If we hit that limit, we'd double the allocation threshold, 
> which would cause a larger structure to be allocated for all newly 
> allocated tasks.

Right, except allocating stuff while in the middle of lockdep is very
hard since it involves taking more locks :-)

I've tried it several times but never quite managed it in a way that I
felt comfortable with.

It would require having a reserve and serializing over that reserve.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-13  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-28 15:04 [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04 ` [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04   ` [RESEND PATCH 02/11] kernel:lockdep:improve implementation of BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04     ` [RESEND PATCH 03/11] kernel:lockdep: introduce match function to BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04       ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04         ` [RESEND PATCH 05/11] kernel:lockdep:implement find_usage_*wards " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04           ` [RESEND PATCH 06/11] kernel:lockdep:introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04             ` [RESEND PATCH 07/11] kernel:lockdep: implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps by BFS tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04               ` [RESEND PATCH 08/11] kernel:lockdep: update memory usage introduced " tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04                 ` [RESEND PATCH 09/11] kernel:lockdep:add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04                   ` [RESEND PATCH 10/11] BFS cleanup tom.leiming
2009-06-28 15:04                     ` [RESEND PATCH 11/11] kernel:lockdep:fix return value of check_usage*() tom.leiming
2009-07-18 14:24                     ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: BFS cleanup tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 17:23                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:03                     ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-18 14:24                   ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Add statistics info for max bfs queue depth tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:03                   ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24                 ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Update memory usage introduced by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 17:23                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-02 13:02                 ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24               ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement lockdep_count_*ward_deps " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02               ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:24             ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce print_shortest_lock_dependencies tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02             ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23           ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement find_usage_*wards by BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02           ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-13  8:02         ` [RESEND PATCH 04/11] kernel:lockdep:implement check_noncircular() " Dave Young
2009-07-13  8:08           ` Dave Young
2009-07-21  3:33             ` Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23         ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Implement " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:02         ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23       ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Introduce match function to BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01       ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-18 14:23     ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Improve implementation of BFS tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01     ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:30   ` [RESEND PATCH 01/11] kernel:lockdep:print the shortest dependency chain if finding a circle Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12  2:42     ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13  7:01       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13  9:14         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-13 13:56           ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13 13:51         ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13  9:01   ` Dave Young
2009-07-18 14:23   ` [tip:core/locking] lockdep: Print " tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-08-02 13:01   ` tip-bot for Ming Lei
2009-07-11  0:43 ` [RESEND PATCH 0/11] kernel:lockdep:replace DFS with BFS Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-11  3:25   ` Ming Lei
2009-07-11 21:09     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-12  2:29       ` Ming Lei
2009-07-13  7:02         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-13  9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16  4:39   ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16  5:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16  7:12       ` Ming Lei
2009-07-16  9:54         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1247476498.7529.54.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox