From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched: Add a preempt count base offset to __might_sleep()
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:34:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247754893.6586.24.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247753686.6586.20.camel@laptop>
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:14 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 02:28 -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +++ b/include/linux/hardirq.h
> > @@ -103,6 +103,13 @@
> > */
> > #define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != PREEMPT_INATOMIC_BASE)
> >
> > +static inline int current_preempt_equals(int preempt_offset)
> > +{
> > + int nested = preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE;
> > +
> > + return (nested == PREEMPT_INATOMIC_BASE + preempt_offset);
> > +}
>
> I'm not sure about it being in hardirq.h, I think we should keep this in
> sched.c.
>
> Also, I'm not sure about the name, but then I suck at naming too. How
> about something like: preempt_count_equals() ?
>
> Other than that the series looks nice and I've got it queued.
I've added this on top:
---
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/hardirq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/hardirq.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/hardirq.h
@@ -103,13 +103,6 @@
*/
#define in_atomic() ((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != PREEMPT_INATOMIC_BASE)
-static inline int current_preempt_equals(int preempt_offset)
-{
- int nested = preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE;
-
- return (nested == PREEMPT_INATOMIC_BASE + preempt_offset);
-}
-
/*
* Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():
* (used by the scheduler, *after* releasing the kernel lock)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -9444,12 +9444,19 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
+static inline int preempt_count_equals(int preempt_offset)
+{
+ int nested = preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE;
+
+ return (nested == PREEMPT_INATOMIC_BASE + preempt_offset);
+}
+
void __might_sleep(char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
{
#ifdef in_atomic
static unsigned long prev_jiffy; /* ratelimiting */
- if ((current_preempt_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled()) ||
+ if ((preempt_count_equals(preempt_offset) && !irqs_disabled()) ||
system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING || oops_in_progress)
return;
if (time_before(jiffies, prev_jiffy + HZ) && prev_jiffy)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-16 6:28 [PATCH 1/7] sched: Drop the need_resched() loop from cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-16 6:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched: Remove obsolete comment in __cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-18 14:21 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-16 6:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched: Cover the CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP off-case for __might_sleep() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-18 14:21 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-16 6:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched: Add a preempt count base offset to __might_sleep() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-16 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 14:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-16 14:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-18 14:22 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-16 6:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: Remove the CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL case definition of cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-18 14:22 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-16 6:28 ` [PATCH 6/7 v3] sched: Pull up the might_sleep() check in cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-18 14:22 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Pull up the might_sleep() check into cond_resched() tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-20 6:50 ` Li Zefan
2009-07-20 8:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-20 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-20 9:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-20 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-20 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-22 17:17 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-07-22 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-07-16 6:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched: Convert the only user of cond_resched_bkl to use cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-18 14:22 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-07-18 14:21 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Drop the need_resched() loop from cond_resched() tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247754893.6586.24.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox