public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kmemleak: Scan all thread stacks
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:01:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247850069.6522.91.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247849826.6313.64.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>

On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 17:57 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 18:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > > 2. Is it safe to use rcu_read_lock() and task_lock() when scanning the
> > >    corresponding kernel stack (thread_info structure)? The loop doesn't
> > >    do any modification to the task list. The reason for this is to
> > >    allow kernel preemption when scanning the stacks.
> > 
> > you cannot generally preempt while holding the RCU read-lock.
> 
> This may work with rcupreempt enabled. But, with classic RCU is it safe
> to call schedule (or cond_resched) while holding the RCU read-lock?

No.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-17 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-17  9:38 [RFC PATCH] kmemleak: Scan all thread stacks Catalin Marinas
2009-07-17 16:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-17 16:57   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-17 17:01     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-07-20 10:09       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-22 16:18       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-07-22 17:03         ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-22 20:16           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1247850069.6522.91.camel@laptop \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox