From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, bblum@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, menage@google.com,
vda.linux@googlemail.com, mikew@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv2][PATCH] flexible array implementation
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:09:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248214145.13249.5671.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090721220017.60A219D3@kernel>
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 15:00 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> The interface is dirt simple. 4 functions:
> alloc_flex_array()
> free_flex_array()
> flex_array_put()
> flex_array_get()
>
> put() appends an item into the array while get() takes
> indexes and does array-style access.
I need to update this description, but the kerneldoc comments are up to
date.
That reminds me... People will get somewhat weird behavior if they mix
flex_array_append() and flex_array_put(). Is that OK? Should
flex_array_put() modify ->nr_elements to point to the element past the
one that was just put()? Should we perhaps drop the append() function
and the ->nr_elements variable completely?
-- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-21 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 22:00 [RFCv2][PATCH] flexible array implementation Dave Hansen
2009-07-21 22:09 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2009-07-21 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-22 3:25 ` Li Zefan
2009-07-22 4:34 ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-22 6:14 ` Li Zefan
2009-07-22 7:09 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-07-22 15:02 ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-22 18:30 ` Matt Helsley
2009-07-22 22:03 ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-22 19:55 ` Mike Waychison
2009-07-22 22:00 ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-22 20:57 ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-22 21:51 ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-22 23:20 ` Benjamin Blum
2009-07-23 5:41 ` Dave Hansen
2009-07-23 2:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-23 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248214145.13249.5671.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bblum@google.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox