From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch 11/12] timekeeper read clock helper functions
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:39:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248989994.3374.13.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090729134231.768960500@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:41 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> plain text document attachment (timekeeper-helper.diff)
> From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
>
> Add timekeeper_read_clock_ntp and timekeeper_read_clock_raw and use
> them for getnstimeofday, ktime_get, ktime_get_ts and getrawmonotonic.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,40 @@ static void timekeeper_setup_internals(s
> timekeeper.shift = clock->shift;
> }
>
> +/* Timekeeper helper functions. */
> +static inline s64 timekeeper_read_clock_ntp(void)
> +{
> + cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> + struct clocksource *clock;
> +
> + /* read clocksource: */
> + clock = timekeeper.clock;
> + cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> +
I know it seems nice to have it here, but I think these helpers would be
more reusable in other contexts if they took the cycle_now value as an
argument. Also I'd drop the ntp bit, just to avoid confusing it with
some ntp specific function. So:
timekeeping_get_ns(cycle_t now);
timekeeping_get_ns_raw(cycle_t now);
That way in some situations we don't have to make two accesses to the
hardware if we want to get both values at the same point.
Seem reasonable?
thanks
-john
> + /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> + cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> +
> + /* return delta convert to nanoseconds using ntp adjusted mult. */
> + return clocksource_cyc2ns(cycle_delta, timekeeper.mult,
> + timekeeper.shift);
> +}
> +
> +static inline s64 timekeeper_read_clock_raw(void)
> +{
> + cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> + struct clocksource *clock;
> +
> + /* read clocksource: */
> + clock = timekeeper.clock;
> + cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> +
> + /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> + cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> +
> + /* return delta convert to nanoseconds using ntp adjusted mult. */
> + return clocksource_cyc2ns(cycle_delta, clock->mult, clock->shift);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * This read-write spinlock protects us from races in SMP while
> * playing with xtime.
> @@ -172,8 +206,6 @@ static void timekeeping_forward_now(void
> */
> void getnstimeofday(struct timespec *ts)
> {
> - cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> - struct clocksource *clock;
> unsigned long seq;
> s64 nsecs;
>
> @@ -183,17 +215,7 @@ void getnstimeofday(struct timespec *ts)
> seq = read_seqbegin(&xtime_lock);
>
> *ts = xtime;
> -
> - /* read clocksource: */
> - clock = timekeeper.clock;
> - cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> -
> - /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> - cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> -
> - /* convert to nanoseconds: */
> - nsecs = clocksource_cyc2ns(cycle_delta, timekeeper.mult,
> - timekeeper.shift);
> + nsecs = timekeeper_read_clock_ntp();
>
> /* If arch requires, add in gettimeoffset() */
> nsecs += arch_gettimeoffset();
> @@ -207,8 +229,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(getnstimeofday);
>
> ktime_t ktime_get(void)
> {
> - cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> - struct clocksource *clock;
> unsigned int seq;
> s64 secs, nsecs;
>
> @@ -218,17 +238,7 @@ ktime_t ktime_get(void)
> seq = read_seqbegin(&xtime_lock);
> secs = xtime.tv_sec + wall_to_monotonic.tv_sec;
> nsecs = xtime.tv_nsec + wall_to_monotonic.tv_nsec;
> -
> - /* read clocksource: */
> - clock = timekeeper.clock;
> - cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> -
> - /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> - cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> -
> - /* convert to nanoseconds: */
> - nsecs += clocksource_cyc2ns(cycle_delta, timekeeper.mult,
> - timekeeper.shift);
> + nsecs += timekeeper_read_clock_ntp();
>
> } while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));
> /*
> @@ -249,8 +259,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ktime_get);
> */
> void ktime_get_ts(struct timespec *ts)
> {
> - cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> - struct clocksource *clock;
> struct timespec tomono;
> unsigned int seq;
> s64 nsecs;
> @@ -261,17 +269,7 @@ void ktime_get_ts(struct timespec *ts)
> seq = read_seqbegin(&xtime_lock);
> *ts = xtime;
> tomono = wall_to_monotonic;
> -
> - /* read clocksource: */
> - clock = timekeeper.clock;
> - cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> -
> - /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> - cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> -
> - /* convert to nanoseconds: */
> - nsecs = clocksource_cyc2ns(cycle_delta, timekeeper.mult,
> - timekeeper.shift);
> + nsecs = timekeeper_read_clock_ntp();
>
> } while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));
>
> @@ -433,23 +431,10 @@ void getrawmonotonic(struct timespec *ts
> {
> unsigned long seq;
> s64 nsecs;
> - cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta;
> - struct clocksource *clock;
>
> do {
> seq = read_seqbegin(&xtime_lock);
> -
> - /* read clocksource: */
> - clock = timekeeper.clock;
> - cycle_now = clock->read(clock);
> -
> - /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> - cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> -
> - /* convert to nanoseconds: */
> - nsecs = clocksource_cyc2ns(cycle_delta, clock->mult,
> - clock->shift);
> -
> + nsecs = timekeeper_read_clock_raw();
> *ts = raw_time;
>
> } while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-30 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 13:41 [RFC][patch 00/12] clocksource / timekeeping rework V2 Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 01/12] introduce timekeeping_leap_insert Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 21:02 ` john stultz
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 02/12] remove clocksource inline functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 14:15 ` Daniel Walker
2009-07-30 21:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-30 21:05 ` john stultz
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 03/12] cleanup clocksource selection Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 04/12] clocksource watchdog highres enablement Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 05/12] clocksource watchdog resume logic Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 06/12] clocksource watchdog refactoring Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 07/12] clocksource watchdog work Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 08/12] introduce struct timekeeper Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 09/12] add xtime_shift and ntp_error_shift to " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 22:15 ` john stultz
2009-07-31 8:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 10/12] move NTP adjusted clock multiplier " Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 22:04 ` john stultz
2009-07-31 7:52 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-31 8:12 ` john stultz
2009-07-31 8:27 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-31 9:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-31 23:32 ` john stultz
2009-08-03 8:02 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-08-13 11:15 ` Linus Walleij
2009-08-13 11:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 11/12] timekeeper read clock helper functions Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-30 21:39 ` john stultz [this message]
2009-07-31 7:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-31 8:11 ` john stultz
2009-07-29 13:41 ` [RFC][patch 12/12] update clocksource with stop_machine Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-29 15:10 ` [RFC][patch 00/12] clocksource / timekeeping rework V2 Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248989994.3374.13.camel@localhost \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox