From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux filesystem caching discussion list
<linux-cachefs@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, oleg <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Incorrect circular locking dependency?
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:08:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1249402132.4762.9.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18723.1249401004@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 16:50 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > Creating a new class for your second workqueue might help,
>
> I only have one workqueue. The problem is there are two waitqueues, but
> init_waitqueue_head() always sets q->lock to the same class.
Ah, right, I read it backwards then.
> > we'd have to pass a second key through __create_workqueue_key() and pass
> > that into init_cpu_workqueue() and apply it to cwq->lock using
> > lockdep_set_class() and co.
>
> Actually, wouldn't just making init_cpu_workqueue() apply a class to
> cwq->more_work that's common to all workqueues suffice?
That's the default behaviour.
> Or even, have
> init_waitqueue_head() apply an alternate class to q->lock?
Right, that would work. Something akin to all the other per instance
classes would do I guess.
Utterly untested..
---
include/linux/wait.h | 9 ++++++++-
kernel/wait.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/wait.h b/include/linux/wait.h
index 6788e1a..cf3c2f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/wait.h
@@ -77,7 +77,14 @@ struct task_struct;
#define __WAIT_BIT_KEY_INITIALIZER(word, bit) \
{ .flags = word, .bit_nr = bit, }
-extern void init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q);
+extern void __init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q, struct lock_class_key *);
+
+#define init_waitqueue_head(q) \
+ do { \
+ static struct lock_class_key __key; \
+ \
+ __init_waitqueue_head((q), &__key); \
+ } while (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
# define __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INIT_ONSTACK(name) \
diff --git a/kernel/wait.c b/kernel/wait.c
index ea7c3b4..c4bd3d8 100644
--- a/kernel/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/wait.c
@@ -10,13 +10,14 @@
#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
-void init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q)
+void __init_waitqueue_head(wait_queue_head_t *q, struct lock_class_key *key)
{
spin_lock_init(&q->lock);
+ lockdep_set_class(&q->lock, key);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->task_list);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_waitqueue_head);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__init_waitqueue_head);
void add_wait_queue(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait)
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-04 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-22 2:37 CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file Christian Kujau
2009-06-22 8:58 ` [Linux-cachefs] " David Howells
2009-06-22 14:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-06-22 15:21 ` David Howells
2009-06-22 15:45 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07 7:21 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-07 13:00 ` David Howells
2009-07-07 13:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-07-27 14:37 ` Incorrect circular locking dependency? David Howells
2009-08-04 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-04 15:50 ` David Howells
2009-08-04 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-04 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-04 17:23 ` [Linux-cachefs] CacheFiles: Readpage failed on backing file David Howells
2009-08-05 10:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-08-07 12:07 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-08-07 14:26 ` David Howells
2009-06-23 0:36 ` Christian Kujau
2009-06-23 7:49 ` Christian Kujau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1249402132.4762.9.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox