From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] perf_counter: fix double list iteration
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:06:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1249574786.32113.550.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249573080.32113.547.camel@twins>
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:38 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 08:26 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Hello Ingo
> >
> > I finally managed to test the threaded perfcounter statistics (thanks a
> > lot for implementing it). I am running 2.6.31-rc5 (with the AMD
> > magny-cours patches but I don't think they matter here). I am trying to
> > measure local/remote memory accesses per thread during the well-known
> > stream benchmark. It's compiled with OpenMP using 16 threads on a
> > quad-socket quad-core barcelona machine.
> >
> > Command line is:
> > /mnt/scratch/bgoglin/cpunode/linux-2.6.31/tools/perf/perf record -f -s
> > -e r1000001e0 -e r1000002e0 -e r1000004e0 -e r1000008e0 ./stream
> >
> > It seems to work fine with a single -e <counter> on the command line
> > while it crashes when there are at least 2 of them.
> > It seems to work fine without -s as well.
>
> OK, I can reproduce OOPSen this way, got me baffled though.
>
> I'll prod at it some...
D'0h really dumb mistake...
---
Subject: perf_counter: fix double list iteration
A silly copy-paste resulted in a messed up iteration which would cause
an OOPS.
Reported-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/perf_counter.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 06d210c..6da7611 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static void perf_counter_sync_stat(struct perf_counter_context *ctx,
__perf_counter_sync_stat(counter, next_counter);
counter = list_next_entry(counter, event_entry);
- next_counter = list_next_entry(counter, event_entry);
+ next_counter = list_next_entry(next_counter, event_entry);
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-06 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-06 6:26 [perf/rc5] oops running perf record -s with multiple -e Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 16:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-06 16:32 ` [PATCH] perf_counter: fix double list iteration Brice Goglin
2009-08-06 17:58 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf_counter: Fix double list iteration in per task precise stats tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 18:28 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1249574786.32113.550.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox