From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752263AbZHMIXc (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:23:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751360AbZHMIXb (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:23:31 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:42735 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751312AbZHMIXa (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:23:30 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC patch] clean up swiotlb check in intel_iommu_init From: David Woodhouse To: Luming Yu Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "Luck, Tony" , LKML , FUJITA Tomonori , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <3877989d0908122011n27589ff8wfc6d6b50912496c6@mail.gmail.com> References: <3877989d0908122011n27589ff8wfc6d6b50912496c6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:23:21 +0100 Message-Id: <1250151801.29180.192.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 (2.26.3-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:11 +0800, Luming Yu wrote: > > Since swiotlb is an fall back option that might have > initialized. We don't need to stop intel_iommu_init > because of swiotlb.. > > Please review. If make sense, please apply. It doesn't apply to the iommu-2.6.git tree. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation