From: Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Zeev Tarantov <zeev.tarantov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] [hwmon] linux 2.6.31-rc6 regression
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:28:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250432893.7591.5.camel@ayu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090816053735.GB1998@phenom2.trippelsdorf.de>
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 07:37 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:03:03AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 01:29:48PM +0300, Zeev Tarantov wrote:
> >
> > > [ 3.276720] w83627ehf: Found W83627DHG chip at 0x290
> > > [ 3.276894] ACPI: I/O resource w83627ehf [0x295-0x296] conflicts
> > > with ACPI region HWRE [0x290-0x299]
> > > [ 3.277171] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
> >
> > The hwmon driver is attempting to allocate a region that's also used by
> > your ACPI firmware. There's no way to synchronise access between the
> > kernel and the firmware, so allowing both is potentially racy - we've
> > seen numerous cases where the combination results in the system
> > incorrectly generating critical temperatuer shutdowns, for instance,
> > when some other indexed access gets interpreted as the temperature or
> > when the hwmon chip's state machine is confused. The failure of hwmon to
> > bind is a feature here, not a bug. You can override it with
> > acpi_enforce_resources=no on the kernel command line.
>
> But we don't introduce »features« that break hardware monitoring on
> numerous machines in rc6 normally, IIRC.
> If this so important and critical to you, than just add a »hyperstrict«
> parameter to acpi_enforce_resources or make »lax« the default.
Note that, as this is an ASUS board, there is actually an ACPI firmware
driver available that will let you do hardware monitoring in a way that
doesn't conflict with the firmware - give the "ASUS ATK0110 ACPI hwmon"
driver a try.
--
Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-16 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-15 10:29 [BUG] [hwmon] linux 2.6.31-rc6 regression Zeev Tarantov
2009-08-15 10:43 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-08-16 1:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-08-16 5:37 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2009-08-16 9:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-08-16 14:39 ` Stefan Richter
2009-08-16 14:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-08-16 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-16 14:28 ` Calvin Walton [this message]
2009-08-16 15:24 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1250432893.7591.5.camel@ayu \
--to=calvin.walton@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=zeev.tarantov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox