From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
linux-parisc <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel segv with 2.6.31-rc6 ?
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:09:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250640565.15079.3.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090818050637.4C3E74730F@magilla.sf.frob.com>
[resending, fluffed reply-all]
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 22:06 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I'd be happy to fail to load it. There might be sysfs issues with it too.
>
> That sounds reasonable to me. And I'd be happy to at least look a little
> and maybe give some advice to anybody who finds themself building such a
> (free) module, doesn't know why or how it got that way, and wants to ask.
Actually, for parisc, its not reasonable. It's expected that our
modules have multiple text sections (we have to use -ffunction-sections
to generate them in order that the PCREL17 jump stubs can be
interleaved).
The problem looks to be that some linker error gave the one of the named
function text sections a duplicate name. Helge, can you post he objdump
info that shows which section had a duplicate name?
Even with the duplicate name, though, the module should be perfectly
loadable.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-19 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4A89CC4D.5040801@gmx.de>
2009-08-17 22:49 ` kernel segv with 2.6.31-rc6 ? James Bottomley
2009-08-17 23:54 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-18 3:18 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-18 3:55 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-18 5:06 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-19 0:09 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-08-19 0:14 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-19 0:54 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-19 1:31 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-19 1:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-19 18:10 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-25 7:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-25 19:24 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-26 12:20 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-26 17:54 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-20 11:51 ` Helge Deller
2009-08-20 12:25 ` Helge Deller
2009-08-20 18:55 ` John David Anglin
2009-08-20 21:45 ` Helge Deller
2009-08-20 21:50 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-20 22:07 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-20 23:01 ` John David Anglin
2009-08-20 23:23 ` Roland McGrath
2009-08-21 0:03 ` John David Anglin
2009-08-25 21:49 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-08-25 7:37 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-20 11:58 ` Helge Deller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1250640565.15079.3.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox