From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751499AbZHSLHi (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:07:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751143AbZHSLHh (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:07:37 -0400 Received: from viefep17-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.37]:52574 "EHLO viefep17-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751036AbZHSLHh (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:07:37 -0400 X-SourceIP: 213.93.53.227 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][RFC] perf_counter: Allow sharing of output channels From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Frederic Weisbecker , Mike Galbraith , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stephane eranian In-Reply-To: <20090819105818.GB21150@elte.hu> References: <20090819091823.916851355@chello.nl> <20090819092023.980284148@chello.nl> <20090819105818.GB21150@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:07:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1250680057.7583.341.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 12:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Provide the ability to configure a counter to send its output to > > another (already existing) counter's output stream. > > > > [ compile tested only ] > > very nice! > > two comments: > > > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_counter.h > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_counter.h > > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_counter.h > > @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ struct perf_counter_attr { > > #define PERF_COUNTER_IOC_REFRESH _IO ('$', 2) > > #define PERF_COUNTER_IOC_RESET _IO ('$', 3) > > #define PERF_COUNTER_IOC_PERIOD _IOW('$', 4, u64) > > +#define PERF_COUNTER_IOC_SET_OUTPUT _IO ('$', 5) > > Time to add a new sys_perf_counter_chattr() syscall and deprecate > the ioctls? Could do I guess.. in order to support things like refresh and reset we need a few new offset fields in the attr struct, but that's doable. > > @@ -415,6 +416,9 @@ enum perf_callchain_context { > > PERF_CONTEXT_MAX = (__u64)-4095, > > }; > > > > +#define PERF_FLAG_FD_NO_GROUP (1U << 0) > > +#define PERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT (1U << 1) > > Why not extend the size of perf_counter_attr and add an output_fd > parameter? Zero would mean no fd (and this is also backwards > compatible behavior). > > FD_NO_GROUP is a bit unclean API as it aliases group_fd to two > purposes: the real group_fd and this new output_fd. I think we > should move output_fd to the attribute structure. Yeah, the NO_GROUP thing is ugly.. I'll wait for some more comments before reworking this.