From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751550AbZHSLXc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:23:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751314AbZHSLXc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:23:32 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:41690 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751266AbZHSLXb (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:23:31 -0400 Subject: Re: spin_is_locked() broken for uniprocessor? From: Peter Zijlstra To: Leon Woestenberg Cc: Alan Cox , David Howells , Thomas Gleixner , Kumar Gala , Linux-Kernel List , Steven Rostedt , linuxppc-dev list , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: References: <7099.1250674686@redhat.com> <20090819115301.563be6da@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:23:13 +0200 Message-Id: <1250680993.7583.350.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:16 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:38:06 +0100 > > > > in drivers because there is driver code that uses spin_is_locked() in > > fairly sensible fashion when dealing with locking. > > > One use is to measure lock contention hits on a particular spin lock. > > > However I wonder if there are tracing capabilities to measure lock > contention on a particular lock? lock_stat no good for you?