From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: eranian@gmail.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Corey J Ashford <cjashfor@us.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
perfmon2-devel <perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 -v2] perf: rework the whole read vs group stuff
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:19:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1250867976.7538.73.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c86c4470908210747u125dc6d6y76a9ca7f1af41160@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 16:47 +0200, stephane eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, I tried that and it brings more complexity than needed
> especially with regards to
> extracting the ID for events when you're doing grouping.
>
> To extract the ID, one has to read out a struct as follows:
> * { u64 nr;
> * { u64 time_enabled; } && PERF_FORMAT_ENABLED
> * { u64 time_running; } && PERF_FORMAT_RUNNING
> * { u64 value;
> * { u64 id; } && PERF_FORMAT_ID
> * } cntr[nr];
> * } && PERF_FORMAT_GROUP
>
> Supposedly, you should have to do this only once per group. Reading
> this stuff using the group leader should yield the values of all the other
> events. This is not what I have observed. All events report the same
> ID as the leader. Not clear why.
Hmm, that's a bug alright.
> As I suggested in a previous message, I don't think all of this is necessary.
> If a tool was able to pass the ID to associate with an event, then there
> would be no need for a read(). Furthermore, it would make it easier to pick
> an ID which suites the tool's data structure. For instance, if you create
> 4 events in a group, the ID could be 0,1,2,3 and would most likely map to
> an index in the array used by the tool to manage the perf_counter structures.
> That would also make it easier in the critical path in the signal handler. No
> need to have a lookup table to map "random" ID to ID more relevant
> for the tool. The ID does not need to be very wide. IDs are relevant only if
> one uses group sampling. Therefore the ID needs to identify an event within
> a group. Could use a reserved field in perf_counter_attr or add an ioctl() to
> assign an ID.
ID are also needed when you want to allow mixing of the output buffers
(in any sense). That is, perf writes all mmap() data into a single file,
which mixes the streams, the other example is the output redirection
patch I posted the other day which basically does the same in-kernel.
A user-provided ID is still possible by extending perf_counter_attr. We
could add this later.
We still need a per-counter unique ID for the inherited thing, and I was
worrying that perhaps we would need to worry about collisions, but I
think these id spaces can be considered separate.
---
Subject: perf_counter: Fix typo in read() output generation
When you iterate a list, using the iterator is useful.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/perf_counter.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_counter.c b/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 36f65e2..f274e19 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@ static int perf_counter_read_group(struct perf_counter *counter,
size += err;
list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, list_entry) {
- err = perf_counter_read_entry(counter, read_format,
+ err = perf_counter_read_entry(sub, read_format,
buf + size);
if (err < 0)
return err;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-13 9:47 [PATCH 0/4] perf_counter: Group reads and other patches Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-13 9:47 ` [PATCH 1/4 -v2] perf: rework the whole read vs group stuff Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-13 11:00 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf: Rework/fix " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-21 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/4 -v2] perf: rework " stephane eranian
2009-08-21 15:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-21 19:36 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf_counter: Fix typo in read() output generation tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-13 9:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf_counter: Fix an ipi-deadlock Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-13 11:00 ` [tip:perfcounters/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-13 9:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Add some comments to the event definitions Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-13 11:01 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-15 10:07 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-13 9:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf_counter: Fix swcounter context invariance Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1250867976.7538.73.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cjashfor@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox