From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junio@pobox.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, htejun@gmail.com, bzolnier@gmail.com,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: git send-email defaults
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:04:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251097490.7538.127.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vfxbj1car.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 19:42 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:08 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > ...
> >> That's pretty new... But perhaps I should complain too, it's been
> >> annoying me forever.
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=git&m=123457137328461&w=2
> >
> > Apparently it didn't happen, nor did I ever see a reply to that posting.
> >
> > Junio, what happened here?
>
> Nothing happened.
>
> I do not recall anybody objecting to, but then when nothing happened in
> neither 1.6.3 nor 1.6.4, nobody jumped up-and-down demanding the change of
> default either. So overall impression I got from this was that nobody
> really cared deeply enough either way.
And here I was thinking it was settled when no objections came ;-)
> But we are talking about 1.7.0 to become a release to correct wrong
> defaults we have had once and for all ;-), and I am tempted to roll this
> topic into the mix. Here is what I queued to my 'next' branch tonight.
The sooner this hits the distros the better..
Thanks for committing the change, looking fwd to 1.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-24 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 10:19 [PATCH 0/6] Lazy workqueues Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: replace singlethread/freezable/rt parameters and variables with flags Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: add support for lazy workqueues Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-08-20 12:10 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] crypto: use " Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] libata: use lazy workqueues for the pio task Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-08-20 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] aio: use lazy workqueues Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 15:09 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-08-21 18:31 ` Zach Brown
2009-08-20 10:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] sunrpc: " Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] Lazy workqueues Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-20 12:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-23 2:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-24 7:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-24 8:04 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-24 9:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-24 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-20 12:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-08-20 12:41 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-20 13:04 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-20 12:59 ` Steven Whitehouse
2009-08-20 12:55 ` Tejun Heo
2009-08-21 6:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251097490.7538.127.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=junio@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox