The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/15] sched: Check sched_mn_power_savings when setting flags for CPU and MN domains
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:57:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251125862.7538.270.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090820134013.GX29327@alberich.amd.com>

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:40 +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Use new function sd_balance_for_mn_power() and adapt
> sd_balance_for_package_power() and sd_power_saving_flags() for correct
> setting of flags SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE and SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE in CPU
> and MN domains.
> 
> Furthermore add flag SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES to MN domain.
> Rational: a multi-node processor most likely shares package resources
> (on Magny-Cours the package constitues a "voltage domain").

IIRC SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES plays games with the cpu_pwer of a
sched_domain, which breaks in all kinds of curious ways, this adds more
breakage afaict.

ego?

> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h |    3 ++-
>  include/linux/sched.h           |   14 ++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> index 6d7d133..4a520b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ static inline void setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) { }
>  				| SD_BALANCE_EXEC	\
>  				| SD_WAKE_AFFINE	\
>  				| SD_WAKE_BALANCE	\
> -				| sd_balance_for_package_power()\
> +				| SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES\
> +				| sd_balance_for_mn_power()\
>  				| sd_power_saving_flags(),\
>  	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
>  	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5755643..c53bdd8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -844,9 +844,18 @@ static inline int sd_balance_for_mc_power(void)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int sd_balance_for_mn_power(void)
> +{
> +	if (sched_mc_power_savings || sched_smt_power_savings)
> +		return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int sd_balance_for_package_power(void)
>  {
> -	if (sched_mc_power_savings | sched_smt_power_savings)
> +	if (sched_mn_power_savings || sched_mc_power_savings ||
> +	    sched_smt_power_savings)
>  		return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -860,7 +869,8 @@ static inline int sd_balance_for_package_power(void)
>  
>  static inline int sd_power_saving_flags(void)
>  {
> -	if (sched_mc_power_savings | sched_smt_power_savings)
> +	if (sched_mn_power_savings || sched_mc_power_savings ||
> +	    sched_smt_power_savings)
>  		return SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE;
>  
>  	return 0;

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-24 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-20 13:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/15] sched: Fix scheduling for multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/15] x86, sched: Add config option for multi-node CPU scheduling Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-21 13:50   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-08-24  8:49     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/15] sched, x86: Provide initializer for MN scheduling domain, define MN level Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/15] sched: Add cpumask to be used when building MN domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/15] sched: Define per CPU variables and cpu_to_group function for " Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:36 ` [PATCH 5/15] sched: Add function to build MN sched domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 6/15] sched: Add support for MN domain in build_sched_groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/15] sched: Activate build of MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:39 ` [PATCH 8/15] sched: Add parameter sched_mn_power_savings to control MN domain sched policy Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:32     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-24 15:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  7:52         ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  7:50       ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  6:24     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  6:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:38         ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-26  9:30   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-27 12:47     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:40 ` [PATCH 9/15] sched: Check sched_mn_power_savings when setting flags for CPU and MN domains Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 14:57   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-08-25  9:34     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-26 10:01   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 10/15] sched: Check for sched_mn_power_savings when doing load balancing Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 15:40     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-08-25  8:00       ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:41 ` [PATCH 11/15] sched: Pass unlimited __cpu_power information to upper domain level groups Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 16:44     ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-24 17:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:19         ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25  7:11           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:04             ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-25  8:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:51     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:42 ` [PATCH 12/15] sched: Allow NODE domain to be parent of MC instead of CPU domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  8:55     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] sched: Detect child domain of NUMA (aka NODE) domain Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  9:13     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] sched: Conditionally limit __cpu_power when child sched domain has type NODE Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25  9:19     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-20 13:46 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86: Fix cpu_coregroup_mask to return correct cpumask on multi-node processors Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-24 15:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-24 18:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:13       ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:36         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-27 13:18           ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  9:31     ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25  9:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-25 10:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:24         ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-25 10:28           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-25 10:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-27 15:42             ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-27 15:25         ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 10:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-28 12:03             ` Andreas Herrmann
2009-08-28 12:50               ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1251125862.7538.270.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox