public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
To: Remy Bohmer <linux@bohmer.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: System lockup with 2.6.26.8-rt16 on ARM9 [Solved]
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:42:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251556965.9909.10.camel@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3efb10970908290047k6f4d5a14of148db7f2b179f18@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 09:47 +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote:

> Well, we found the root cause of this problem.
> It turned out to be caused by sched_clock() that made disjunct time jumps.
> This caused this check to become true in kernel/sched_rt.c:370:
>          if (rt_rq->rt_time > runtime) {
>                 rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1;
>                 if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq)) {
>                         sched_rt_rq_dequeue(rt_rq);
>                         return 1;
>                 }
>         }
> 
> The end results is that all realtime tasks got throttled for a long
> time, and that time got extended every time sched_clock() made such a
> jump. I would never have expected the scheduler would show this kind
> of behaviour while CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is _not_ set...
> 
> The root-cause of the sched_clock being faulty was a synchronisation
> issue between 2 clock domains. The CPU clock and the clock domain of
> the peripheral (GPT) on which the sched_clock() implementation was
> based. The GPT made jumps backwards which triggered a false wraparound
> detection in the conversion of 32->64 bit timestamps, causing the time
> to jump about 356 seconds in the future...
> 

Can you tell us more about what type of board this was? I've never heard
of a ARM board having an unstable clocksource before ..

Daniel


  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-29 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-29  7:47 System lockup with 2.6.26.8-rt16 on ARM9 [Solved] Remy Bohmer
2009-08-29 14:42 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2009-08-30  9:34   ` Remy Bohmer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1251556965.9909.10.camel@desktop \
    --to=dwalker@fifo99.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@bohmer.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox