From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
To: Remy Bohmer <linux@bohmer.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: System lockup with 2.6.26.8-rt16 on ARM9 [Solved]
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:42:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1251556965.9909.10.camel@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3efb10970908290047k6f4d5a14of148db7f2b179f18@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 09:47 +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Well, we found the root cause of this problem.
> It turned out to be caused by sched_clock() that made disjunct time jumps.
> This caused this check to become true in kernel/sched_rt.c:370:
> if (rt_rq->rt_time > runtime) {
> rt_rq->rt_throttled = 1;
> if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq)) {
> sched_rt_rq_dequeue(rt_rq);
> return 1;
> }
> }
>
> The end results is that all realtime tasks got throttled for a long
> time, and that time got extended every time sched_clock() made such a
> jump. I would never have expected the scheduler would show this kind
> of behaviour while CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED is _not_ set...
>
> The root-cause of the sched_clock being faulty was a synchronisation
> issue between 2 clock domains. The CPU clock and the clock domain of
> the peripheral (GPT) on which the sched_clock() implementation was
> based. The GPT made jumps backwards which triggered a false wraparound
> detection in the conversion of 32->64 bit timestamps, causing the time
> to jump about 356 seconds in the future...
>
Can you tell us more about what type of board this was? I've never heard
of a ARM board having an unstable clocksource before ..
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-29 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-29 7:47 System lockup with 2.6.26.8-rt16 on ARM9 [Solved] Remy Bohmer
2009-08-29 14:42 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2009-08-30 9:34 ` Remy Bohmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1251556965.9909.10.camel@desktop \
--to=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@bohmer.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox