public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Anirban Sinha <ASinha@zeugmasystems.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: RE: question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:54:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252306486.7423.72.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC483@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>

On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 17:18 -0700, Anirban Sinha wrote:
> 
> 
> > Dunno.  Fly or die little patchlet (toss).
> 
> > sched: allow the user to disable RT bandwidth aggregation.
> 
> Hmm. Interesting. With this change, my results are as follows:
> 
> rt_runtime/rt_period   % of reg iterations
> 
> 0.2                    100%
> 0.25                   100%
> 0.3                    100%
> 0.4                    100%
> 0.5                    82%
> 0.6                    66%
> 0.7                    54%
> 0.8                    46%
> 0.9                    38.5%
> 0.95                   32%
> 
> 
> This results are on a quad core blade. Does it still makes sense
> though?
> Can anyone else run the same tests on a quadcore over the latest
> kernel? I will patch our 2.6.26 kernel with upstream fixes and rerun
> these tests on tuesday.

I tested tip (v2.6.31-rc9-1357-ge6a3cd0) with a little perturbation
measurement proglet on an isolated Q6600 core.

10s measurement interval results:

sched_rt_runtime_us  RT utilization
950000               94.99%
750000               75.00%
500000               50.04%
250000               25.02%
 50000                5.03%

Seems to work fine here.

	-Mike


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-07  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <dgRNo-3uc-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <dhb9j-1hp-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <dhcf5-263-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-09-06  2:32     ` question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us Ani
2009-09-06  6:32       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-06 10:18         ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found]           ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC482@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-06 15:09             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-07  0:41               ` Anirban Sinha
     [not found]               ` <1252311463.7586.26.camel@marge.simson.net>
2009-09-07 11:06                 ` [rfc] lru_add_drain_all() vs isolation Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 13:35                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-07 13:53                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 14:18                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-07 14:25                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 23:56                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08  8:20                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 10:06                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 10:20                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 11:41                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 12:05                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 14:03                               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 14:20                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 15:22                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 15:27                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 15:32                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09  4:27                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-09 14:08                                         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 23:43                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10 18:03                                             ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 15:39                                         ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 16:18                                           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:46                                             ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 23:58                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10  1:00                                             ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-10  1:15                                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10  1:23                                                 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09  2:06                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
     [not found]         ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC483@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
     [not found]           ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC485@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-07  0:28             ` question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us Anirban Sinha
2009-09-07  6:54           ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
     [not found]             ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC489@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08  7:10               ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08  9:26                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-07  7:59         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07  8:24           ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found]           ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC487@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08  7:08             ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08  8:42               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 14:41                 ` Anirban Sinha
     [not found]         ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC48B@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08 17:41           ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 19:06             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-08 19:34               ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-09  4:10                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-05 17:13 Anirban Sinha
     [not found] <Acotv57vW6nkRxQOQLuBf8W5yfJIlwAAtMAw>
2009-09-05  0:55 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-05 17:43   ` Lucas De Marchi
2009-09-05 20:40   ` Fabio Checconi
2009-09-05 22:40     ` Lucas De Marchi
     [not found]     ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC481@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-06  0:47       ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-06 13:21         ` Fabio Checconi
     [not found]           ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC484@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-07  0:26             ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 17:26           ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 21:37             ` Anirban Sinha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1252306486.7423.72.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=ASinha@zeugmasystems.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox