From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Anirban Sinha <ASinha@zeugmasystems.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: RE: question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:54:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252306486.7423.72.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC483@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 17:18 -0700, Anirban Sinha wrote:
>
>
> > Dunno. Fly or die little patchlet (toss).
>
> > sched: allow the user to disable RT bandwidth aggregation.
>
> Hmm. Interesting. With this change, my results are as follows:
>
> rt_runtime/rt_period % of reg iterations
>
> 0.2 100%
> 0.25 100%
> 0.3 100%
> 0.4 100%
> 0.5 82%
> 0.6 66%
> 0.7 54%
> 0.8 46%
> 0.9 38.5%
> 0.95 32%
>
>
> This results are on a quad core blade. Does it still makes sense
> though?
> Can anyone else run the same tests on a quadcore over the latest
> kernel? I will patch our 2.6.26 kernel with upstream fixes and rerun
> these tests on tuesday.
I tested tip (v2.6.31-rc9-1357-ge6a3cd0) with a little perturbation
measurement proglet on an isolated Q6600 core.
10s measurement interval results:
sched_rt_runtime_us RT utilization
950000 94.99%
750000 75.00%
500000 50.04%
250000 25.02%
50000 5.03%
Seems to work fine here.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-07 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <dgRNo-3uc-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dhb9j-1hp-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dhcf5-263-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-09-06 2:32 ` question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us Ani
2009-09-06 6:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-06 10:18 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC482@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-06 15:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-07 0:41 ` Anirban Sinha
[not found] ` <1252311463.7586.26.camel@marge.simson.net>
2009-09-07 11:06 ` [rfc] lru_add_drain_all() vs isolation Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 13:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-07 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-07 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 23:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 10:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 14:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 15:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 15:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 4:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-09 14:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 23:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 15:39 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 16:18 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:46 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 23:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10 1:00 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-10 1:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10 1:23 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 2:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC483@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC485@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-07 0:28 ` question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us Anirban Sinha
2009-09-07 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC489@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08 7:10 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 9:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-07 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 8:24 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC487@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08 7:08 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 14:41 ` Anirban Sinha
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC48B@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08 17:41 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 19:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-08 19:34 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-09 4:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-05 17:13 Anirban Sinha
[not found] <Acotv57vW6nkRxQOQLuBf8W5yfJIlwAAtMAw>
2009-09-05 0:55 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-05 17:43 ` Lucas De Marchi
2009-09-05 20:40 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-09-05 22:40 ` Lucas De Marchi
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC481@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-06 0:47 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-06 13:21 ` Fabio Checconi
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC484@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-07 0:26 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 17:26 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 21:37 ` Anirban Sinha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252306486.7423.72.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=ASinha@zeugmasystems.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox