From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Anirban Sinha <ani@anirban.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>,
Anirban Sinha <ASinha@zeugmasystems.com>
Subject: Re: question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:06:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252436788.6923.14.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <217247FB-ED91-4A24-B698-71CEEFA58636@anirban.org>
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:41 -0700, Anirban Sinha wrote:
> On 2009-09-08, at 10:32 AM, Anirban Sinha wrote:
>
> > Dunno. Fly or die little patchlet (toss).
>
> So it would be nice to have a knob like this when CGROUPS is disabled
> (it say 'say N when unsure' :)). CPUSETS depends on CGROUPS.
Maybe. Short term hack. My current thoughts on the subject, after some
testing, is that the patchlet should just die, and pondering the larger
solution should happen.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <dgRNo-3uc-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dhb9j-1hp-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dhcf5-263-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-09-06 2:32 ` question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us Ani
2009-09-06 6:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-06 10:18 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC482@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-06 15:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-07 0:41 ` Anirban Sinha
[not found] ` <1252311463.7586.26.camel@marge.simson.net>
2009-09-07 11:06 ` [rfc] lru_add_drain_all() vs isolation Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 13:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-07 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-07 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 23:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 10:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 11:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-08 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 14:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 15:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-08 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 15:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 4:27 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-09 14:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 23:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-09 15:39 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 16:18 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:46 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 23:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10 1:00 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-10 1:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-10 1:23 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-09 2:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC483@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC485@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-07 0:28 ` question on sched-rt group allocation cap: sched_rt_runtime_us Anirban Sinha
2009-09-07 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC489@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08 7:10 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 9:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-07 7:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-07 8:24 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC487@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08 7:08 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 8:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-08 14:41 ` Anirban Sinha
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC48B@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-08 17:41 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 19:06 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-09-08 19:34 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-09 4:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-05 17:13 Anirban Sinha
[not found] <Acotv57vW6nkRxQOQLuBf8W5yfJIlwAAtMAw>
2009-09-05 0:55 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-05 17:43 ` Lucas De Marchi
2009-09-05 20:40 ` Fabio Checconi
2009-09-05 22:40 ` Lucas De Marchi
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC481@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-06 0:47 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-06 13:21 ` Fabio Checconi
[not found] ` <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C54DC484@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
2009-09-07 0:26 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 17:26 ` Anirban Sinha
2009-09-08 21:37 ` Anirban Sinha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252436788.6923.14.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=ASinha@zeugmasystems.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ani@anirban.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox