Re: 2.6.32 -mm merge plans

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 23:51 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 20:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:03:57 +0900 Paul Mundt wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:15:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> > mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch
> >> > mtd-nand-add-page-parameter-to-all-read_page-read_page_raw-apis.patch
> >> > mtd-nand-add-new-ecc-mode-ecc_hw_oob_first.patch
> >> > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips.patch
> >> > mtd-nand-davinci-add-4-bit-ecc-support-for-large-page-nand-chips-update.patch
> >> > mtd-jffs2-fix-read-buffer-overflow.patch
> >> > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-eraseregions.patch
> >> > mtd-prevent-a-read-from-regions.patch
> >> > mtd-jedec_probe-fix-nec-upd29f064115-detection.patch
> >> > mtdpart-memory-accessor-interface-for-mtd-layer.patch
> >> >
> >> >   -> dwmw2
> >>
> >> Regarding mtd-make-onenand-genericc-more-generic.patch, I'm not really
> >> sure what happened. To recap:
> >>
> >> It was posted to the mtd list here:
> >>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026805.html
> >>
> >> Kyungmin objected to the driver name change here:
> >>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026807.html
> >>
> >> I pointed out that the rough rationale for the name change here:
> >>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026808.html
> >>
> >> and offered to redo the patch keeping the old name if Kyungmin felt the
> >> rationale wasn't valid, but received no reply. Subsequently, Artem
> >> mentioned that he had merged it in to his l2-mtd-2.6.git tree here:
> >>
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-August/026866.html
> >>
> >> which subsequently seems to not actually have happened.
> >>
> >> This is a pretty trivial patch, and I don't mind respinning it in
> >> whatever form folks are content with. I had assumed given the mention
> >> that it had been merged in to the l2 tree that the rationale was
> >> sufficient for merging.
> >
> > I don't think that Artem's tree is in linux-next, so I have no
> > visibility of what's happening with that patch.
> >
> > I do think that Artem's tree should be in linux-next.
> >
> > I guess I'll just hose the patch at dwmw2 and will see what happens.  I
> > sent it on Aug 6, with no effect.
> 
> i guess i shouldnt try and bounce a few more mtd patches through you huh ...
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/vapier/blackfin.git;a=shortlog;h=for-mtd
> 
> hopefully they make it in this cycle (they were posted a while ago to
> the mtd lists w/feedback addressed)

Well, these patches have been sitting in my tree in dunno for long as
well. They are still there:

http://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git/commit/951d5f4097ccf8c41ccbab6d4116509b89b705fd
and below.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)