From: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:49:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253112555.3273.164.camel@linux-1lbu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ljkfoywm.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 14:30 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> writes:
>
> > +config OLD_CPU_DELAY
> > + depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
> > + bool "Accurate delays for some older CPUs"
> > + def_bool n
> > + help
> > + Try enable this if observing longer than expected delays and need
> > + more accuracy. May cause instability in some CPUs.
> > +
>
> There is still this uncertain "accurate" in the text. Why don't just
>
> + bool "Different delay() code for some older CPUs"
Sounds good. I also update text under help to better quantify
"accuracy". Updated patch below. Separately, as Russel pointed out,
this should only be done by experienced people, so we even bother with
this patch since the only people should touch this are the people who
knows all the details.
Document #if 0 code block in delay.S and make it selectable for compile.
Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
arch/arm/lib/delay.S | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index aef63c8..ca8d535 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -813,6 +813,14 @@ config ARM_ERRATA_460075
ACTLR register. Note that setting specific bits in the ACTLR
register
may not be available in non-secure mode.
+config OLD_CPU_DELAY
+ depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
+ bool "Different delay() code for some older CPUs"
+ def_bool n
+ help
+ Try enable this if observing longer than expected delays. This code
+ improves accuracy for some CPUs while cause instability in others.
+
endmenu
source "arch/arm/common/Kconfig"
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
index 8d6a876..67e679b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ ENTRY(__const_udelay) @ 0 <= r0 <= 0x7fffff06
@ Delay routine
ENTRY(__delay)
subs r0, r0, #1
-#if 0
+#ifdef CONFIG_OLD_CPU_DELAY
movls pc, lr
subs r0, r0, #1
movls pc, lr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-13 21:05 [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S Felipe Contreras
2009-09-13 21:28 ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-13 23:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 0:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-14 8:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 12:58 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 14:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 14:38 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 14:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 15:14 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 15:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 15:50 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 16:25 ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-14 16:54 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 15:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-14 16:06 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 16:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-15 10:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-15 10:47 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-15 11:20 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 12:29 ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 13:41 ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-15 16:30 ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 18:58 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 19:44 ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 20:39 ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-15 21:04 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-15 22:26 ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 22:47 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-16 8:26 ` Steve Chen
2009-09-16 12:30 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-16 14:49 ` Steve Chen [this message]
2009-09-16 20:21 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-09-16 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-17 19:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-17 19:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-17 21:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Steve Chen
2009-09-17 21:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-17 22:25 ` Steve Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253112555.3273.164.camel@linux-1lbu \
--to=schen@mvista.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox