From: Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartmann <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation devtmpfs maintenance disaster
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:35:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253205332.4718.9.camel@quest> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090917141303.428fe73c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 918 bytes --]
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:13 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > * A static dev is faster.
> >
> > A static /dev is unreliable and unpredictable, and can not be used in
> > any not very limited and controlled environment. It's pure theory for
>
> Moblin appears to be the fastest boot and doesn't use it. I fact Arjan
> seems pretty anti
>
And of the "ordinary" distros, Ubuntu has the fastest boot and we are
very keen to use devtmpfs, and I am very pro.
I don't really see the issue here. If Arjan doesn't want to use
devtmpfs for Moblin, he doesn't have to. We want to use devtmpfs for
Ubuntu, and I'm pretty sure that SuSE, Fedora and RedHat all want to too
based on the signed off and tested-by of the patch.
If there are bugs, they can be fixed as we go. It certainly works for
me, and we've even found udev bugs as a result of it.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
scott@canonical.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 8:23 [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation devtmpfs maintenance disaster Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-17 12:03 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-17 13:13 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-17 16:35 ` Scott James Remnant [this message]
2009-09-17 17:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-17 18:59 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-09-17 19:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-18 12:57 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-18 13:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-18 13:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-18 14:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-18 14:11 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 14:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-18 14:32 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 14:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-18 14:58 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 15:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-18 15:32 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 19:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-18 14:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-17 12:57 ` Greg KH
2009-09-17 13:05 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-17 13:29 ` Greg KH
2009-09-17 15:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-18 6:03 ` Greg KH
2009-09-18 9:25 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-18 15:05 ` Greg KH
2009-09-17 17:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-17 18:53 ` [bug] /etc/profile: line 30: /dev/null: Permission denied (Was: Re: [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation devtmpfs maintenance disaster) Ingo Molnar
2009-09-17 19:18 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-17 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-17 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-18 5:58 ` Greg KH
2009-09-25 20:49 ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-27 22:52 ` Greg KH
2009-09-17 22:26 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-17 22:41 ` Alan Cox
2009-09-18 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 1:50 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 6:02 ` Greg KH
2009-09-18 11:50 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 14:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 15:05 ` Greg KH
2009-09-18 15:37 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 19:35 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-20 1:43 ` Dave Airlie
2009-09-20 15:08 ` Greg KH
2009-09-21 2:58 ` Dave Airlie
[not found] ` <ac3eb2510909200912o76e0d4e4l2dcaf352fe6b4e19@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <ac3eb2510909200914g1ed6a47cydc0edec6fff96ef4@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-21 2:59 ` Dave Airlie
2009-10-20 20:32 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-09-20 17:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-18 20:58 ` [bug] /etc/profile: line 30: /dev/null: Permission denied Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-18 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 21:19 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 21:31 ` Kay Sievers
2009-09-18 22:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-09-18 5:54 ` [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation devtmpfs maintenance disaster Greg KH
2009-09-18 12:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253205332.4718.9.camel@quest \
--to=scott@canonical.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox