From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Josh and Ingo review feedback and bloatwatch RCU
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:45:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1253688342.7695.99.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090922222443.GA3178@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 15:24 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This patch set applies two sets of review feedback from Josh Triplett and
> checkpatch feedback from Ingo Molnar. It also contains a forward-port
> of Bloatwatch RCU, courtesy of David Howells.
It would be much easier to review if these patches had a changelog
describing the problem they address :-)
The first one seems to do:
A)
- aggregate 'rsp->completed == rsp->gpnum' expressions into a
common function.
- consistently use ACCESS_ONCE() in the above mentioned function
B)
- use DIV_ROUND_UP()
C)
- aggregate list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[rnp->gpnum & 0x01])
expressions into a common function.
Could have been three patches, but ACK.
The second patch seems to mostly add comments, but also moves code
around and makes it static, which could have been split in two patches.
The purpose of the move code around bit could be a cleanup?
Looks to preserve the logic, but didn't go out on a limb to verify, ACK.
The third and fourth do have an adequate changelog :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-23 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 22:24 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Josh and Ingo review feedback and bloatwatch RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-22 22:25 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] Apply review feedback from Josh Triplett, part 1 Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-22 22:25 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] Apply review feedback from Josh Triplett, part 2 Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-22 22:25 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] Apply Ingo's checkpatch feedback Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-22 22:25 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] v6 RCU: the bloatwatch edition Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-23 6:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-09-23 13:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Josh and Ingo review feedback and bloatwatch RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-23 19:04 ` Josh Triplett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-23 16:50 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] Josh and Ingo review feedback and Bloatwatch RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-23 19:10 ` Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1253688342.7695.99.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox