From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752984AbZI1NWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:22:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752961AbZI1NWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:22:16 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:46119 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752956AbZI1NWO (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:22:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 03/33] fs: scale files_lock From: Peter Zijlstra To: npiggin@suse.de Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20090904065534.303326352@nick.local0.net> References: <20090904065142.114706411@nick.local0.net> <20090904065534.303326352@nick.local0.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:22:19 +0200 Message-Id: <1254144139.15795.4.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 16:51 +1000, npiggin@suse.de wrote: > +static void file_list_lock_all(void) > +{ > + int i; > + int nr = 0; > + > + for_each_possible_cpu(i) { > + spinlock_t *lock; > + > + lock = &per_cpu(files_cpulock, i); > + spin_lock_nested(lock, nr); > + nr++; > + } > +} Same here, this'll make lockdep explode on >8-way. And create large spin times on large smp boxen.