The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>
To: ext Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kobject: bail early if no new_parent in kobject_move()
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:52:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254819129.23533.27.camel@pcarmody-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091005183753.4d77afcb@gondolin>

On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 18:37 +0200, ext Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu,  1 Oct 2009 17:50:48 +0300,
> Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>
> > 
> > In the absense of kobj->kset, new_parent would remain NULL.
> > NULL-dereference shenanighans then ensues in the subsequent
> > sysfs_move_dir(..., new_parent) call. Bail early instead.
> 
> But sysfs_move_dir(..., NULL) should work and fall back to the sysfs
> root...

I guess there are two schools of thought - the strict and the
accommodating. I was contemplating resending an even stricter patch, but
there's nothing wrong with adopting sane safe fallbacks instead. 

> <looks at code>
> 
> It seems that has been broken for some time. Should probably be
> something like this instead (uncompiled); I can send it with proper
> description and s-o-b once I gave it a test.
> 
> ---
>  fs/sysfs/dir.c |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> @@ -894,7 +894,8 @@ int sysfs_move_dir(struct kobject *kobj,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&sysfs_rename_mutex);
>  	BUG_ON(!sd->s_parent);
> -	new_parent_sd = new_parent_kobj->sd ? new_parent_kobj->sd : &sysfs_root;
> +	new_parent_sd = (new_parent_kobj && new_parent_kobj->sd) ?
> +		new_parent_kobj->sd : &sysfs_root;
>  
>  	error = 0;
>  	if (sd->s_parent == new_parent_sd)

Looks like it knocks the NULL dereference squarely on the head. Yup.

Phil
-- 
"They weren't designed to run on a computer, they were designed
to run on a Powerpoint slide projector." -- Peter Gutmann


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-06  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-01 14:50 [PATCH 1/1] Kobject: bail early if no new_parent in kobject_move() Phil Carmody
2009-10-01 14:49 ` Greg KH
2009-10-01 15:01   ` Phil Carmody
2009-10-01 15:01     ` Greg KH
2009-10-05 16:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2009-10-06  8:52   ` Phil Carmody [this message]
2009-10-06 13:33     ` Cornelia Huck
2009-10-06 13:33     ` [PATCH] sysfs: Allow sysfs_move_dir(..., NULL) again Cornelia Huck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1254819129.23533.27.camel@pcarmody-desktop \
    --to=ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox