From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: place root rcu_node structure in separate lockdep class
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:31:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254994319.26976.264.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12548908983277-git-send-email->
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 21:48 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Before this patch, all of the rcu_node structures were in the same lockdep
> class, so that lockdep would complain when rcu_preempt_offline_tasks()
> acquired the root rcu_node structure's lock while holding one of the leaf
> rcu_nodes' locks. This patch changes rcu_init_one() to use a separate
> spin_lock_init() for the root rcu_node structure's lock than is used for
> that of all of the rest of the rcu_node structures, which puts the root
> rcu_node structure's lock in its own lockdep class.
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index d8d9865..705f02a 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1647,7 +1647,8 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> cpustride *= rsp->levelspread[i];
> rnp = rsp->level[i];
> for (j = 0; j < rsp->levelcnt[i]; j++, rnp++) {
> - spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock);
> + if (rnp != rcu_get_root(rsp))
> + spin_lock_init(&rnp->lock);
> rnp->gpnum = 0;
> rnp->qsmask = 0;
> rnp->qsmaskinit = 0;
> @@ -1670,6 +1671,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blocked_tasks[1]);
> }
> }
> + spin_lock_init(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock);
> }
>
> /*
An alternative version that would not change any code in the !LOCKDEP
case would read as:
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index d8d9865..113f274 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1625,6 +1625,8 @@ static void __init rcu_init_levelspread(struct rcu_state *rsp)
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT */
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_root_class;
+
/*
* Helper function for rcu_init() that initializes one rcu_state structure.
*/
@@ -1670,6 +1672,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blocked_tasks[1]);
}
}
+ lockdep_set_class(&rcu_get_root(rsp)->lock, &rcu_root_class);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-08 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-07 4:47 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] rcu: prevent hangs by simplifying rcu_barrier/CPU-hotplug, fix lockdep complaint Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-07 4:48 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: move rcu_barrier() to rcutree Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-07 6:16 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Move " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-07 4:48 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: make hot-unplugged CPU relinquish its own RCU callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-07 6:17 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Make " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: make " Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 13:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-07 4:48 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: place root rcu_node structure in separate lockdep class Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-07 6:17 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Place " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-08 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-10-07 6:14 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] rcu: prevent hangs by simplifying rcu_barrier/CPU-hotplug, fix lockdep complaint Ingo Molnar
2009-10-07 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254994319.26976.264.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox