From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ben Efros <ben@pc-doctor.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Josua Dietze <digidietze@draisberghof.de>,
fangxiaozhi <huananhu@huawei.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Hugh Blemings <hugh@blemings.org>
Subject: Re: USB serial regression 2.6.31.1 -> 2.6.31.2 [PATCH]
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:44:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255326252.2192.110.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7550119.564321255277798089.JavaMail.root@mail.pc-doctor.com>
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 09:16 -0700, Ben Efros wrote:
> No I don't think its a good idea to turn off SANE_SENSE in this situation.
> Here is a patch similar to Ben Herrenschmidt's but will not turn off SANE_SENSE
> just because a transport failure.
>
> Retry with short sense when SANE_SENSE fails.
Works for me too.
Alan, what do you think ? I definitely don't like Ben E's most recent
patch with a quirk for all devices, it's simply a lot more code for
something that will come back and bite again when somebody does the
same mistake again. I'd rather have the request sense code be more
robust. But this patch is fine, as was my previous one.
So it boils down on clearing SANE_SENSE vs. not clearing it. If we
clear it, we probably want to keep it cleared (via an INSANE_SENSE
flag ?). But on the other hand, I don't think that always going
for a retry when a SANE_SENSE fails is going to hurt and sounds
like the robust thing to do, so I don't mind that simple patch
from Ben. So up to you :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
> Signed-off-by: Ben Efros <ben@pc-doctor.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> --- linux-2.6.31.1/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c 2009-09-24 08:45:25.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.31.1.new/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c 2009-10-11 08:06:26.000000000 -0700
> @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ void usb_stor_invoke_transport(struct sc
> /* device supports and needs bigger sense buffer */
> if (us->fflags & US_FL_SANE_SENSE)
> sense_size = ~0;
> -
> +Retry_Sense:
> US_DEBUGP("Issuing auto-REQUEST_SENSE\n");
>
> scsi_eh_prep_cmnd(srb, &ses, NULL, 0, sense_size);
> @@ -723,6 +723,12 @@ void usb_stor_invoke_transport(struct sc
> if (temp_result != USB_STOR_TRANSPORT_GOOD) {
> US_DEBUGP("-- auto-sense failure\n");
>
> + if ((us->fflags & US_FL_SANE_SENSE) &&
> + sense_size != US_SENSE_SIZE) {
> + sense_size = US_SENSE_SIZE;
> + US_DEBUGP("-- retry without SANE_SENSE\n");
> + goto Retry_Sense;
> + }
> /* we skip the reset if this happens to be a
> * multi-target device, since failure of an
> * auto-sense is perfectly valid
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-12 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <26767470.564301255277612694.JavaMail.root@mail.pc-doctor.com>
2009-10-11 16:16 ` USB serial regression 2.6.31.1 -> 2.6.31.2 [PATCH] Ben Efros
2009-10-12 5:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-10-12 14:58 ` Alan Stern
2009-10-12 15:12 ` Matthew Dharm
2009-10-12 15:18 ` Ben Efros
2009-10-12 21:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-10-13 4:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-10-13 14:03 ` Alan Stern
2009-10-13 23:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-10-14 2:29 ` Greg KH
[not found] <19395543.564391255279074897.JavaMail.root@mail.pc-doctor.com>
2009-10-11 16:38 ` Ben Efros
2009-10-11 20:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-10-12 1:54 ` Alan Stern
2009-10-12 3:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-10-12 14:27 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1255326252.2192.110.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ben@pc-doctor.com \
--cc=digidietze@draisberghof.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=huananhu@huawei.com \
--cc=hugh@blemings.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox