From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@redhat.com>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] perf_counter tools: remove expensive old debug code from perf top
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:41:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1255444919.7042.2.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013133707.GA21409@elte.hu>
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:37 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > perf_counter tools: remove expensive old debug code from perf top
> >
> > Calling gettimeofday() at high frequency is painful for handicapped
> > boxen. The spot calling gettimeofday() is old unneeded debug code, so
> > remove it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> We still seem to have a performance problem. Just running perf top on a
> 16-way box:
>
> Performance counter stats for 'perf top -e cycles -c 3000000':
>
> 585.694831 task-clock-msecs # 0.113 CPUs
> 35163 context-switches # 0.060 M/sec
> 17 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec
> 20355 page-faults # 0.035 M/sec
> 1476952962 cycles # 2521.711 M/sec
> 730770658 instructions # 0.495 IPC
> 11489471 cache-references # 19.617 M/sec
> 2055001 cache-misses # 3.509 M/sec
>
> 5.169518576 seconds time elapsed
>
> that's 11% of CPU time used on a single CPU - just displaying a measly
> 16K irqs/sec. Something's not quite right here.
I'll try to figure out why after I do some more wakeup preempt testing.
btw, something broke top annotation (again). Module symbols still
annotate, but vmlinux symbols went south.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-13 12:57 [patch] perf_counter tools: remove expensive old debug code from perf top Mike Galbraith
2009-10-13 13:34 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Remove " tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2009-10-13 13:37 ` [patch] perf_counter tools: remove " Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 14:41 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-10-13 14:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1255444919.7042.2.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox