public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ntp-dev-4.2.5p235-RC build failure: MOD_NANO not #defined
@ 2009-10-20 18:38 James Cloos
  2009-10-20 19:27 ` [ntp:hackers] " Dave Hart
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: James Cloos @ 2009-10-20 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hackers, linux-kernel; +Cc: Roman Zippel, Thomas Gleixner, john stultz

I get this when trying to build the 235 RC:

make[1]: Entering directory `.../work/ntp-dev-4.2.5p235-RC/ntpd'
if i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..  -I../include -I../lib/isc/include -I../lib/isc/nothreads/include -I../lib/isc/unix/include -I../libopts -I/usr/include  -march=pentium3 -O2 -Wno-error   -Wall -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wstrict-overflow -Wno-strict-prototypes -MT ntp_loopfilter.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/ntp_loopfilter.Tpo" -c -o ntp_loopfilter.o ntp_loopfilter.c; \
        then mv -f ".deps/ntp_loopfilter.Tpo" ".deps/ntp_loopfilter.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/ntp_loopfilter.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
ntp_loopfilter.c: In function 'local_clock':
ntp_loopfilter.c:521: error: 'MOD_NANO' undeclared (first use in this function)
ntp_loopfilter.c:521: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ntp_loopfilter.c:521: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [ntp_loopfilter.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `.../work/ntp-dev-4.2.5p235-RC/ntpd'
make: *** [all] Error 2

In ntp_loopfilter.c, MOD_NANO is protected w/in an #ifdef STA_NANO.

I find STA_NANO #defined in <linux/timex.h>, but I cannot find a
definition for MOD_NANO anywhere.

That said, <linux/timex.h> does #define several MOD_ defines in a block
called /* xntp 3.4 compatibility names */ to match the ADJ_ defines;
it #defines ADJ_NANO, but does not include a MOD_NANO #define in that
compatability block.

Also, my <sys/timex.h> (from glibc-2.10.1) says:

sys/timex.h> /* These definitions from linux/timex.h as of 2.6.30.  */


Should ntp_loopfilter.c be using ADJ_NANO instead of MOD_NANO?

Or should timex.h #define MOD_NANO ADJ_NANO?

All of the additions to linux/timex.h since 2.6.30 then are protected
within an #ifdef __KERNEL__ and would, therefore, make no difference.

(In case it is an lk issue, I've included lkml and (following lkml style)
my best guess at the relevant CCs; in case it is an ntpd issue it is also
sent to the ntp hackers list; I do not know whether the latter list
requires subscription to post....)

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-22  2:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-20 18:38 ntp-dev-4.2.5p235-RC build failure: MOD_NANO not #defined James Cloos
2009-10-20 19:27 ` [ntp:hackers] " Dave Hart
2009-10-20 20:45   ` john stultz
2009-10-20 23:22     ` James Cloos
2009-10-21  0:43       ` john stultz
2009-10-21 23:03         ` Reg Clemens
2009-10-22  1:58           ` Harlan Stenn

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox