From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not available
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:47:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256248050.2546.9.camel@sbs-t61> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256225689.32075.6.camel@gaiman.anholt.net>
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 08:34 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Can we just not create the _wc sysfs entry if we don't have PAT? I
> don't think there's userland relying on its presence as opposed to the
> non-_wc entry.
Yes indeed. Jesse do you see an issue with this? This is simple and
clean. Thanks Eric.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-21 13:45 [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not available Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 14:11 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-21 17:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-21 20:01 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 9:53 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 15:34 ` Eric Anholt
2009-10-22 21:47 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2009-10-22 23:10 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-23 0:11 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23 1:53 ` Eric Anholt
2009-10-23 4:31 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-10-23 4:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23 7:24 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-23 14:24 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-23 14:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-23 4:33 ` Suresh Siddha
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-22 14:41 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 14:27 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 12:08 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-22 12:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-10-22 13:26 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-22 13:35 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-21 14:38 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-19 15:10 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 15:07 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 14:59 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 15:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 21:49 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-20 20:35 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-20 21:59 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-21 11:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 14:47 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-20 19:54 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-21 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-13 7:34 Jan Beulich
2009-10-13 21:29 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-14 8:13 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-14 19:14 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-15 7:48 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-17 19:48 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-19 9:16 ` Jan Beulich
2009-10-19 13:44 ` Suresh Siddha
2009-10-19 13:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19 13:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] <200910122032.52168.thomas.schlichter@web.de>
2009-10-12 19:16 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2009-10-12 19:45 ` Thomas Schlichter
[not found] ` <1255378684.2063.5.camel@gaiman.anholt.net>
2009-10-13 21:05 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-10 1:22 Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-10 4:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-10 8:31 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-10 15:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-10 17:50 ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-11 7:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-11 9:56 ` Thomas Schlichter
2009-10-11 18:51 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-11 18:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-11 20:19 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-10-12 18:09 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1256248050.2546.9.camel@sbs-t61 \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=thomas.schlichter@web.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox