public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: hackbench regression with kernel 2.6.32-rc1
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:26:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1256797608.16282.28.camel@ymzhang> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256795190.7048.63.camel@marge.simson.net>

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 06:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 08:50 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:22 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 17:29 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > > 	-Mike
> > > > I'm investigating 5% tbench regression on Nehalem machine. perf_counter shows
> > > > select_task_rq_fair consumes about 5% cpu time with 2.6.32-rc1 while it consumes
> > > > less than 0.5% with 2.6.31.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch c88d5910890 has comments to explain it, but I still can't understand why
> > > > to add complicated balance logic when selecting task rq.
> > > > 
> > > > I will check which section in function select_task_rq_fair consumes so much time.
> > > 
> > > Turn off SD_WAKE_BALANCE as it was called in rc1.  See commit 182a85f.
> > I run testing against 2.6.32-rc1 which already includes the patch.
> 
> Duh, I checked the wrong tree.
> 
> SD_PREFER_LOCAL is still on in rc1 though (double checks;), so you'll go
> through the power saving code until you reach a domain containing both
> waker's cpu and wakee's previous cpu even if that code already found
> that a higher domain wasn't overloaded.  Looks to me like that block
> wants a want_sd && qualifier. 
> 
> Even it you turn SD_PREFER_LOCAL off, you can still hit the overhead if
> SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE is set, so I'd make sure both are off and see if
> that's the source (likely, since the rest is already off).
Yes. SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE is disabled by default. I applied Peter's patch which
turning SD_PREFER_LOCAL off for MC and cpu domain and it doesn't help.
perf counter shows select_task_rq_fair still consumes about 5% cpu time. Eventually,
I found for_each_cpu in for_each_domain consumes the 5% cpu time, because Peter's
patch doesn't turn off SD_PREFER_LOCAL for node domain.
I turned it off for node domain against the latest tips tree and tbench regression
disappears on a Nehalem machine and becomes about 2% on another one.

Can we turn it off for node domain by default?



  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-29  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-09  9:19 hackbench regression with kernel 2.6.32-rc1 Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-09 10:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-12  7:05   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-12  8:05     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-12 14:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-10-12 14:33       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-13  3:12       ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-13  9:39         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-13 11:08           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-16 11:06         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-27  8:03           ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-27 14:42             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-28  9:29               ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-28 14:22                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-29  0:50                   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-29  5:46                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-29  6:26                       ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
2009-10-29  9:14                         ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2009-10-30  2:02                           ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-14 13:13   ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Do less agressive buddy clearing tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1256797608.16282.28.camel@ymzhang \
    --to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox