public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: [regression bisect -next] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:40:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257190811.19608.2.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091102182808.GA8950@elte.hu>

On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 19:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> FYI, non-SMP builds broke:
> 
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `kthread_bind':
> (.text+0x1d328): undefined reference to `sched_kthread_bind'
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

Oops.  Outside the SMP block might work a little better.

sched: Move the body of kthread_bind() to sched.c.

Eric Paris reported that commit f685ceacab07d3f6c236f04803e2f2f0dbcc5afb
causes boot time PREEMPT_DEBUG complaints.

[    4.590699] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod/1314
[    4.593043] caller is task_hot+0x86/0xd0
[    4.593872] Pid: 1314, comm: rmmod Tainted: G        W  2.6.32-rc3-fanotify #127
[    4.595443] Call Trace:
[    4.596177]  [<ffffffff812ad35b>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x11b/0x120
[    4.597337]  [<ffffffff81051d66>] task_hot+0x86/0xd0
[    4.598320]  [<ffffffff81066275>] set_task_cpu+0x115/0x270
[    4.599368]  [<ffffffff810985ab>] kthread_bind+0x6b/0x100
[    4.600354]  [<ffffffff810914f0>] start_workqueue_thread+0x30/0x60
[    4.601545]  [<ffffffff810941dd>] __create_workqueue_key+0x18d/0x2f0
[    4.602526]  [<ffffffff810d9bee>] stop_machine_create+0x4e/0xd0
[    4.603811]  [<ffffffff810c5818>] sys_delete_module+0x98/0x250
[    4.604922]  [<ffffffff810e2505>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x205/0x290
[    4.606202]  [<ffffffff81013202>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Since kthread_bind() messes with scheduler internals, move the body to sched.c,
and lock the runqueue.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Reported-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>

---
 kernel/kthread.c |   15 ++++++---------
 kernel/sched.c   |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/kthread.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/kthread.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create(int (
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_create);
 
+extern void sched_kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu);
+
 /**
  * kthread_bind - bind a just-created kthread to a cpu.
  * @k: thread created by kthread_create().
@@ -157,18 +159,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_create);
  * Description: This function is equivalent to set_cpus_allowed(),
  * except that @cpu doesn't need to be online, and the thread must be
  * stopped (i.e., just returned from kthread_create()).
+ *
+ * The runqueue must be locked, ergo move the body if this function
+ * to sched.c
  */
 void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	/* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
-	if (!wait_task_inactive(k, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)) {
-		WARN_ON(1);
-		return;
-	}
-	set_task_cpu(k, cpu);
-	k->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
-	k->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = 1;
-	k->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
+	sched_kthread_bind(k, cpu);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_bind);
 
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1992,6 +1992,37 @@ static inline void check_class_changed(s
 		p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, oldprio, running);
 }
 
+/**
+ * sched_kthread_bind - bind a just-created kthread to a cpu.
+ * @k: thread created by kthread_create().
+ * @cpu: cpu (might not be online, must be possible) for @k to run on.
+ *
+ * Description: This function is equivalent to set_cpus_allowed(),
+ * except that @cpu doesn't need to be online, and the thread must be
+ * stopped (i.e., just returned from kthread_create()).
+ *
+ * Function lives here instead of kthread.c because it messes with
+ * scheduler internals which require locking.
+ */
+void sched_kthread_bind(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	/* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
+	if (!wait_task_inactive(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)) {
+		WARN_ON(1);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
+	set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+	p->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
+	p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = 1;
+	p->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 /*
  * Is this task likely cache-hot:



  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-02 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-29  2:42 [regression bisect -next] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod Eric Paris
2009-10-29  8:39 ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2009-10-29  9:14   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-29  9:19     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-29 10:48       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-10-29 12:41         ` Eric Paris
2009-11-02 18:28         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 19:40           ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-11-02 20:01             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-02 20:15               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-05 10:42             ` There is something with scheduler (was Re: [patch] Re: [regression bisect -next] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod) Lai Jiangshan
2009-11-05 14:13               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-05 14:30                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-05 23:10                   ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2009-11-06  2:31                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-11-06  4:27                       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-06  5:11                         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-06  4:46                       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-02 18:55         ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix kthread_bind() by moving the body of kthread_bind() to sched.c tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2009-11-03  7:04         ` tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2009-11-26 17:09 ` [regression bisect -next] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod Leyendecker, Robert
2009-11-26 17:22   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1257190811.19608.2.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox