public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Americo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update fix X86_64 procfs provide stack information for threads
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:21:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257373275.18448.7.camel@wall-e> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091104120019.GK31511@one.firstfloor.org>

Hi Andi,

what do you think about this? The following patch implements a more
accurate KSTK_ESP. The usersp of the task will be updated in the device
and apci_timer interrupt. It would be easy to change other interrupts
too. The performance penalty should tiny. 

--- linux-2.6.32-rc5.old/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.32-rc5.new/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-11-04 23:02:53.705275836 +0100
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@
 #define thread_saved_pc(t)	(*(unsigned long *)((t)->thread.sp - 8))
 
 #define task_pt_regs(tsk)	((struct pt_regs *)(tsk)->thread.sp0 - 1)
-#define KSTK_ESP(tsk)		-1 /* sorry. doesn't work for syscall. */
+extern unsigned long KSTK_ESP(struct task_struct *task);
 #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
 
 extern void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long new_ip,
@@ -1052,4 +1052,12 @@
 	return ratio;
 }
 
+#define update_usersp(regs)                                              \
+({                                                                       \
+	unsigned long __stk__ = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(current); \
+	unsigned long __stkp__ = (regs)->sp;                             \
+	if ((__stkp__ < __stk__) || (__stkp__ >= __stk__ + THREAD_SIZE)) \
+		current->thread.usersp = __stkp__;                       \
+})
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_PROCESSOR_H */
--- x/linux-2.6.32-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c	2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.32-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c	2009-11-03 10:11:11.202957393 +0100
@@ -664,3 +664,9 @@
 	return do_arch_prctl(current, code, addr);
 }
 
+unsigned long KSTK_ESP(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	return (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_IA32)) ? \
+			(task_pt_regs(task)->sp) : \
+			((task)->thread.usersp);
+}
--- linux-2.6.32-rc5.old/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c	2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.32-rc5.new/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c	2009-11-04 22:29:55.762951577 +0100
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
 
 	stack_overflow_check(regs);
+	update_usersp(regs);
 
 	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 	if (unlikely(!desc))
--- linux-2.6.32-rc5.old/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c	2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.32-rc5.new/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c	2009-11-04 23:12:32.805086991 +0100
@@ -831,6 +831,9 @@
 {
 	struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_X86_32
+	update_usersp(regs);
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * NOTE! We'd better ACK the irq immediately,
 	 * because timer handling can be slow.

This works in my environment under load, but i have not the oversight if it work
under all circumstances. 

Stefani



      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-04 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-03  7:31 [PATCH] update fix X86_64 procfs provide stack information for threads Stefani Seibold
2009-11-03  8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-03  9:06   ` Stefani Seibold
2009-11-03 18:16     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-05  8:19     ` [PATCH] RFC x86_64 more accurate KSTK_ESP implementation Stefani Seibold
2009-11-05 11:08       ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 12:11         ` Stefani Seibold
2009-11-08 11:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-08 12:51         ` Stefani Seibold
2009-11-08 12:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-08 14:00             ` Stefani Seibold
2009-11-08 16:34               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-08 19:37         ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-05 13:02     ` [PATCH] fix /proc/<pid>/stat stack pointer for kernel threads Stefani Seibold
2009-11-13  8:01     ` [tip:x86/urgent] fs: " Stefani Seibold
2009-11-04 11:17 ` [PATCH] update fix X86_64 procfs provide stack information for threads Andi Kleen
2009-11-04 11:50   ` Stefani Seibold
2009-11-04 12:00     ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-04 12:22       ` Stefani Seibold
2009-11-04 15:42       ` Stefani Seibold
2009-11-04 22:21       ` Stefani Seibold [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1257373275.18448.7.camel@wall-e \
    --to=stefani@seibold.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox