public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, andi@firstfloor.org, fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/21] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:15:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258391726-30264-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258391726-30264-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Work flags are about to see more traditional mask handling.  Define
WORK_STRUCT_*_BIT as the bit position constant and redefine
WORK_STRUCT_* as bit masks.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |   15 +++++++++------
 kernel/workqueue.c        |   14 +++++++-------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 5ff8c44..8e689d1 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -23,8 +23,11 @@ typedef void (*work_func_t)(struct work_struct *work);
 #define work_data_bits(work) ((unsigned long *)(&(work)->data))
 
 enum {
-	WORK_STRUCT_PENDING	= 0,	/* work item is pending execution */
-	WORK_STRUCT_STATIC	= 1,	/* static initializer (debugobjects) */
+	WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT	= 0,	/* work item is pending execution */
+	WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT	= 1,	/* static initializer (debugobjects) */
+
+	WORK_STRUCT_PENDING	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT,
+	WORK_STRUCT_STATIC	= 1 << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT,
 
 	/*
 	 * Reserve 3bits off of cwq pointer.  This is enough and
@@ -47,7 +50,7 @@ struct work_struct {
 };
 
 #define WORK_DATA_INIT()	ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0)
-#define WORK_DATA_STATIC_INIT()	ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(2)
+#define WORK_DATA_STATIC_INIT()	ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC)
 
 struct delayed_work {
 	struct work_struct work;
@@ -109,7 +112,7 @@ extern void __init_work(struct work_struct *work, int onstack);
 extern void destroy_work_on_stack(struct work_struct *work);
 static inline bool work_static(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	return test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC, work_data_bits(work));
+	return test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT, work_data_bits(work));
 }
 #else
 static inline void __init_work(struct work_struct *work, int onstack) { }
@@ -178,7 +181,7 @@ static inline bool work_static(struct work_struct *work) { return false; }
  * @work: The work item in question
  */
 #define work_pending(work) \
-	test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))
+	test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))
 
 /**
  * delayed_work_pending - Find out whether a delayable work item is currently
@@ -193,7 +196,7 @@ static inline bool work_static(struct work_struct *work) { return false; }
  * @work: The work item in question
  */
 #define work_clear_pending(work) \
-	clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))
+	clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))
 
 enum {
 	WQ_FREEZEABLE		= 1 << 0, /* freeze during suspend */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f30977f..0083da6 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int work_fixup_activate(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
 		 * statically initialized. We just make sure that it
 		 * is tracked in the object tracker.
 		 */
-		if (test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC, work_data_bits(work))) {
+		if (test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) {
 			debug_object_init(work, &work_debug_descr);
 			debug_object_activate(work, &work_debug_descr);
 			return 0;
@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ static inline void set_wq_data(struct work_struct *work,
 	BUG_ON(!work_pending(work));
 
 	atomic_long_set(&work->data, (unsigned long)cwq |
-			(work_static(work) ? (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC) : 0) |
-			(1UL << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING) | extra_flags);
+			(work_static(work) ? WORK_STRUCT_STATIC : 0) |
+			WORK_STRUCT_PENDING | extra_flags);
 }
 
 static inline
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ queue_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))) {
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) {
 		__queue_work(cpu, wq, work);
 		ret = 1;
 	}
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ int queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	struct timer_list *timer = &dwork->timer;
 	struct work_struct *work = &dwork->work;
 
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))) {
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) {
 		BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer));
 		BUG_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry));
 
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
 	 * might deadlock.
 	 */
 	INIT_WORK_ON_STACK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
-	__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
+	__set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
 	init_completion(&barr->done);
 
 	debug_work_activate(&barr->work);
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
 	int ret = -1;
 
-	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work)))
+	if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work)))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-16 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-16 17:15 [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 01/21] workqueue: fix race condition in schedule_on_each_cpu() Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 23:04   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-17  0:08     ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17  7:04     ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-17 16:16       ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 02/21] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 03/21] workqueue: Add debugobjects support Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 04/21] sched: implement scheduler notifiers Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 18:31   ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-16 18:43     ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 18:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-16 18:54     ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 20:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-17 16:16         ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 05/21] kvm: convert kvm to use new " Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 06/21] sched: drop preempt notifiers Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 07/21] sched: implement sched_notifier_wake_up_process() Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 08/21] scheduler: implement force_cpus_allowed_ptr() Tejun Heo
2009-11-17  5:14   ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-17  5:19     ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 09/21] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 10/21] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 11/21] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 12/21] workqueue: merge feature parametesr into flags Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 13/21] workqueue: update cwq alignement and make one more flag bit available Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 15/21] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 16/21] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 17/21] workqueue: simple reimplementation of SINGLE_THREAD workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-17  0:47   ` Andy Walls
2009-11-17  5:23     ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 12:05       ` Andy Walls
2009-11-17 16:21         ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 16:26           ` Hi ... I want to introduce myself :) Setiajie &#20313;&#40251;&#26124;
2009-11-17 15:05       ` [PATCH 17/21] workqueue: simple reimplementation of SINGLE_THREAD workqueue Linus Torvalds
2009-11-17 16:12         ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 19:01           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-17 14:03   ` Johannes Berg
2009-11-17 16:24     ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 18/21] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 19/21] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 11:39   ` Louis Rilling
2009-11-17 11:51     ` Louis Rilling
2009-11-17 16:25       ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 20/21] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 21/21] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using cwq->frozen_works queue Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1258391726-30264-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox