From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, andi@firstfloor.org, fweisbec@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 14/21] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:15:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258391726-30264-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258391726-30264-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Work flags are about to see more traditional mask handling. Define
WORK_STRUCT_*_BIT as the bit position constant and redefine
WORK_STRUCT_* as bit masks.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 15 +++++++++------
kernel/workqueue.c | 14 +++++++-------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 5ff8c44..8e689d1 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -23,8 +23,11 @@ typedef void (*work_func_t)(struct work_struct *work);
#define work_data_bits(work) ((unsigned long *)(&(work)->data))
enum {
- WORK_STRUCT_PENDING = 0, /* work item is pending execution */
- WORK_STRUCT_STATIC = 1, /* static initializer (debugobjects) */
+ WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT = 0, /* work item is pending execution */
+ WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT = 1, /* static initializer (debugobjects) */
+
+ WORK_STRUCT_PENDING = 1 << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT,
+ WORK_STRUCT_STATIC = 1 << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT,
/*
* Reserve 3bits off of cwq pointer. This is enough and
@@ -47,7 +50,7 @@ struct work_struct {
};
#define WORK_DATA_INIT() ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0)
-#define WORK_DATA_STATIC_INIT() ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(2)
+#define WORK_DATA_STATIC_INIT() ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC)
struct delayed_work {
struct work_struct work;
@@ -109,7 +112,7 @@ extern void __init_work(struct work_struct *work, int onstack);
extern void destroy_work_on_stack(struct work_struct *work);
static inline bool work_static(struct work_struct *work)
{
- return test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC, work_data_bits(work));
+ return test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT, work_data_bits(work));
}
#else
static inline void __init_work(struct work_struct *work, int onstack) { }
@@ -178,7 +181,7 @@ static inline bool work_static(struct work_struct *work) { return false; }
* @work: The work item in question
*/
#define work_pending(work) \
- test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))
+ test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))
/**
* delayed_work_pending - Find out whether a delayable work item is currently
@@ -193,7 +196,7 @@ static inline bool work_static(struct work_struct *work) { return false; }
* @work: The work item in question
*/
#define work_clear_pending(work) \
- clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))
+ clear_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))
enum {
WQ_FREEZEABLE = 1 << 0, /* freeze during suspend */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f30977f..0083da6 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static int work_fixup_activate(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
* statically initialized. We just make sure that it
* is tracked in the object tracker.
*/
- if (test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC, work_data_bits(work))) {
+ if (test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_STATIC_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) {
debug_object_init(work, &work_debug_descr);
debug_object_activate(work, &work_debug_descr);
return 0;
@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ static inline void set_wq_data(struct work_struct *work,
BUG_ON(!work_pending(work));
atomic_long_set(&work->data, (unsigned long)cwq |
- (work_static(work) ? (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_STATIC) : 0) |
- (1UL << WORK_STRUCT_PENDING) | extra_flags);
+ (work_static(work) ? WORK_STRUCT_STATIC : 0) |
+ WORK_STRUCT_PENDING | extra_flags);
}
static inline
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ queue_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct work_struct *work)
{
int ret = 0;
- if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))) {
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) {
__queue_work(cpu, wq, work);
ret = 1;
}
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ int queue_delayed_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct timer_list *timer = &dwork->timer;
struct work_struct *work = &dwork->work;
- if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work))) {
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work))) {
BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer));
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry));
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static void insert_wq_barrier(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq,
* might deadlock.
*/
INIT_WORK_ON_STACK(&barr->work, wq_barrier_func);
- __set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
+ __set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(&barr->work));
init_completion(&barr->done);
debug_work_activate(&barr->work);
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int try_to_grab_pending(struct work_struct *work)
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
int ret = -1;
- if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, work_data_bits(work)))
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT, work_data_bits(work)))
return 0;
/*
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-16 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 17:15 [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 01/21] workqueue: fix race condition in schedule_on_each_cpu() Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 23:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-17 0:08 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 7:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-17 16:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 02/21] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 03/21] workqueue: Add debugobjects support Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 04/21] sched: implement scheduler notifiers Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 18:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-16 18:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-16 18:54 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 20:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-17 16:16 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 05/21] kvm: convert kvm to use new " Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 06/21] sched: drop preempt notifiers Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 07/21] sched: implement sched_notifier_wake_up_process() Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 08/21] scheduler: implement force_cpus_allowed_ptr() Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 5:14 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-17 5:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 09/21] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 10/21] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 11/21] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 12/21] workqueue: merge feature parametesr into flags Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 13/21] workqueue: update cwq alignement and make one more flag bit available Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 15/21] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 16/21] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 17/21] workqueue: simple reimplementation of SINGLE_THREAD workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 0:47 ` Andy Walls
2009-11-17 5:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 12:05 ` Andy Walls
2009-11-17 16:21 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 16:26 ` Hi ... I want to introduce myself :) Setiajie 余鴻昌
2009-11-17 15:05 ` [PATCH 17/21] workqueue: simple reimplementation of SINGLE_THREAD workqueue Linus Torvalds
2009-11-17 16:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 19:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-17 14:03 ` Johannes Berg
2009-11-17 16:24 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 18/21] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 19/21] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2009-11-17 11:39 ` Louis Rilling
2009-11-17 11:51 ` Louis Rilling
2009-11-17 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 20/21] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works Tejun Heo
2009-11-16 17:15 ` [PATCH 21/21] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using cwq->frozen_works queue Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1258391726-30264-15-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox