From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, awalls@radix.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, cl@linux-foundation.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, avi@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/19] sched: update sched_notifier and add wakeup/sleep notifications
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:46:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1258692407-8985-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258692407-8985-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Update sched_notifier such that
* in and out ops are symmetric in the parameter they take.
* Use single fire_sched_notifier() macro instead of separate function
for each op.
* Allow NULL ops.
* Add wakeup and sleep notifications.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 20 +++++++++++++-------
kernel/sched.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 37c97a1..657372f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1214,15 +1214,21 @@ struct sched_notifier;
/**
* sched_notifier_ops - notifiers called for scheduling events
- * @in: we're about to be rescheduled:
- * notifier: struct sched_notifier for the task being scheduled
- * cpu: cpu we're scheduled on
- * @out: we've just been preempted
- * notifier: struct sched_notifier for the task being preempted
- * next: the task that's kicking us out
+ * @wakeup: we're waking up
+ * notifier: struct sched_notifier for the task being woken up
+ * @sleep: we're going to bed
+ * notifier: struct sched_notifier for the task sleeping
+ * @in: we're now running on the cpu
+ * notifier: struct sched_notifier for the task being scheduled in
+ * prev: the task which ran before us
+ * @out: we're leaving the cpu
+ * notifier: struct sched_notifier for the task being scheduled out
+ * next: the task which will run after us
*/
struct sched_notifier_ops {
- void (*in)(struct sched_notifier *notifier, int cpu);
+ void (*wakeup)(struct sched_notifier *notifier);
+ void (*sleep)(struct sched_notifier *notifier);
+ void (*in)(struct sched_notifier *notifier, struct task_struct *prev);
void (*out)(struct sched_notifier *notifier, struct task_struct *next);
};
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 7ef5757..88c0fda 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1389,6 +1389,16 @@ static const u32 prio_to_wmult[40] = {
/* 15 */ 119304647, 148102320, 186737708, 238609294, 286331153,
};
+#define fire_sched_notifier(p, callback, args...) do { \
+ struct task_struct *__p = (p); \
+ struct sched_notifier *__sn; \
+ struct hlist_node *__pos; \
+ \
+ hlist_for_each_entry(__sn, __pos, &__p->sched_notifiers, link) \
+ if (__sn->ops->callback) \
+ __sn->ops->callback(__sn , ##args); \
+} while (0)
+
static void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
/*
@@ -2414,6 +2424,7 @@ out_activate:
else
schedstat_inc(p, se.nr_wakeups_remote);
activate_task(rq, p, 1);
+ fire_sched_notifier(p, wakeup);
success = 1;
/*
@@ -2653,25 +2664,6 @@ void sched_notifier_unregister(struct sched_notifier *notifier)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_notifier_unregister);
-static void fire_sched_in_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr)
-{
- struct sched_notifier *notifier;
- struct hlist_node *node;
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(notifier, node, &curr->sched_notifiers, link)
- notifier->ops->in(notifier, raw_smp_processor_id());
-}
-
-static void fire_sched_out_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr,
- struct task_struct *next)
-{
- struct sched_notifier *notifier;
- struct hlist_node *node;
-
- hlist_for_each_entry(notifier, node, &curr->sched_notifiers, link)
- notifier->ops->out(notifier, next);
-}
-
/**
* prepare_task_switch - prepare to switch tasks
* @rq: the runqueue preparing to switch
@@ -2689,7 +2681,7 @@ static inline void
prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next)
{
- fire_sched_out_notifiers(prev, next);
+ fire_sched_notifier(current, out, next);
prepare_lock_switch(rq, next);
prepare_arch_switch(next);
}
@@ -2731,7 +2723,7 @@ static void finish_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
prev_state = prev->state;
finish_arch_switch(prev);
perf_event_task_sched_in(current, cpu_of(rq));
- fire_sched_in_notifiers(current);
+ fire_sched_notifier(current, in, prev);
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
if (mm)
@@ -5417,10 +5409,12 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
- if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)))
+ if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev))) {
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
- else
+ } else {
+ fire_sched_notifier(prev, sleep);
deactivate_task(rq, prev, 1);
+ }
switch_count = &prev->nvcsw;
}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 4e8e33f..006358d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2695,11 +2695,11 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *sched_notifier_to_vcpu(struct sched_notifier *sn)
return container_of(sn, struct kvm_vcpu, sched_notifier);
}
-static void kvm_sched_in(struct sched_notifier *sn, int cpu)
+static void kvm_sched_in(struct sched_notifier *sn, struct task_struct *prev)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = sched_notifier_to_vcpu(sn);
- kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu);
+ kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, smp_processor_id());
}
static void kvm_sched_out(struct sched_notifier *sn, struct task_struct *next)
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-20 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-20 4:46 [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue, take#2 Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 01/19] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 02/19] workqueue: Add debugobjects support Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 03/19] sched: rename preempt_notifier to sched_notifier and always enable it Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 05/19] sched: implement sched_notifier_wake_up_process() Tejun Heo
2009-11-21 12:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 06/19] scheduler: implement force_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2009-11-21 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 07/19] acpi: use queue_work_on() instead of binding workqueue worker to cpu0 Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-20 6:24 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 08/19] stop_machine: reimplement without using workqueue Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 09/19] workqueue: misc/cosmetic updates Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 10/19] workqueue: merge feature parametesr into flags Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 11/19] workqueue: update cwq alignement and make one more flag bit available Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 12/19] workqueue: define both bit position and mask for work flags Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 13/19] workqueue: separate out process_one_work() Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 14/19] workqueue: temporarily disable workqueue tracing Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 15/19] workqueue: kill cpu_populated_map Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 8:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 16/19] workqueue: reimplement workqueue flushing using color coded works Tejun Heo
2009-12-04 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-04 19:42 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-07 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-07 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-07 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-07 10:48 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 17/19] workqueue: introduce worker Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 23:44 ` Andy Walls
2009-11-21 2:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 18/19] workqueue: reimplement work flushing using linked works Tejun Heo
2009-11-20 4:46 ` [PATCH 19/19] workqueue: reimplement workqueue freeze using cwq->frozen_works queue Tejun Heo
2009-11-21 3:37 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: prepare for concurrency managed workqueue, take#2 Tejun Heo
2009-11-21 12:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23 1:48 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1258692407-8985-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=awalls@radix.net \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox