From: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 24/34] x86/amd-iommu: Move some pte allocation functions in the right section
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:55:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259330145-14865-25-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259330145-14865-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com>
This patch moves alloc_pte() and fetch_pte() into the page
table handling code section so that the forward declarations
for them could be removed.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
index 17e83ec..90b3650 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
@@ -59,15 +59,10 @@ struct iommu_cmd {
static int dma_ops_unity_map(struct dma_ops_domain *dma_dom,
struct unity_map_entry *e);
-static u64 *alloc_pte(struct protection_domain *domain,
- unsigned long address, int end_lvl,
- u64 **pte_page, gfp_t gfp);
static void dma_ops_reserve_addresses(struct dma_ops_domain *dom,
unsigned long start_page,
unsigned int pages);
static void reset_iommu_command_buffer(struct amd_iommu *iommu);
-static u64 *fetch_pte(struct protection_domain *domain,
- unsigned long address, int map_size);
static void update_domain(struct protection_domain *domain);
/****************************************************************************
@@ -665,6 +660,100 @@ void amd_iommu_flush_all_devices(void)
****************************************************************************/
/*
+ * This function is used to add another level to an IO page table. Adding
+ * another level increases the size of the address space by 9 bits to a size up
+ * to 64 bits.
+ */
+static bool increase_address_space(struct protection_domain *domain,
+ gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ u64 *pte;
+
+ if (domain->mode == PAGE_MODE_6_LEVEL)
+ /* address space already 64 bit large */
+ return false;
+
+ pte = (void *)get_zeroed_page(gfp);
+ if (!pte)
+ return false;
+
+ *pte = PM_LEVEL_PDE(domain->mode,
+ virt_to_phys(domain->pt_root));
+ domain->pt_root = pte;
+ domain->mode += 1;
+ domain->updated = true;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static u64 *alloc_pte(struct protection_domain *domain,
+ unsigned long address,
+ int end_lvl,
+ u64 **pte_page,
+ gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ u64 *pte, *page;
+ int level;
+
+ while (address > PM_LEVEL_SIZE(domain->mode))
+ increase_address_space(domain, gfp);
+
+ level = domain->mode - 1;
+ pte = &domain->pt_root[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
+
+ while (level > end_lvl) {
+ if (!IOMMU_PTE_PRESENT(*pte)) {
+ page = (u64 *)get_zeroed_page(gfp);
+ if (!page)
+ return NULL;
+ *pte = PM_LEVEL_PDE(level, virt_to_phys(page));
+ }
+
+ level -= 1;
+
+ pte = IOMMU_PTE_PAGE(*pte);
+
+ if (pte_page && level == end_lvl)
+ *pte_page = pte;
+
+ pte = &pte[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
+ }
+
+ return pte;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function checks if there is a PTE for a given dma address. If
+ * there is one, it returns the pointer to it.
+ */
+static u64 *fetch_pte(struct protection_domain *domain,
+ unsigned long address, int map_size)
+{
+ int level;
+ u64 *pte;
+
+ level = domain->mode - 1;
+ pte = &domain->pt_root[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
+
+ while (level > map_size) {
+ if (!IOMMU_PTE_PRESENT(*pte))
+ return NULL;
+
+ level -= 1;
+
+ pte = IOMMU_PTE_PAGE(*pte);
+ pte = &pte[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
+
+ if ((PM_PTE_LEVEL(*pte) == 0) && level != map_size) {
+ pte = NULL;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return pte;
+}
+
+/*
* Generic mapping functions. It maps a physical address into a DMA
* address space. It allocates the page table pages if necessary.
* In the future it can be extended to a generic mapping function
@@ -820,37 +909,6 @@ static int init_unity_mappings_for_device(struct dma_ops_domain *dma_dom,
*/
/*
- * This function checks if there is a PTE for a given dma address. If
- * there is one, it returns the pointer to it.
- */
-static u64 *fetch_pte(struct protection_domain *domain,
- unsigned long address, int map_size)
-{
- int level;
- u64 *pte;
-
- level = domain->mode - 1;
- pte = &domain->pt_root[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
-
- while (level > map_size) {
- if (!IOMMU_PTE_PRESENT(*pte))
- return NULL;
-
- level -= 1;
-
- pte = IOMMU_PTE_PAGE(*pte);
- pte = &pte[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
-
- if ((PM_PTE_LEVEL(*pte) == 0) && level != map_size) {
- pte = NULL;
- break;
- }
- }
-
- return pte;
-}
-
-/*
* This function is used to add a new aperture range to an existing
* aperture in case of dma_ops domain allocation or address allocation
* failure.
@@ -1535,69 +1593,6 @@ static void update_domain(struct protection_domain *domain)
}
/*
- * This function is used to add another level to an IO page table. Adding
- * another level increases the size of the address space by 9 bits to a size up
- * to 64 bits.
- */
-static bool increase_address_space(struct protection_domain *domain,
- gfp_t gfp)
-{
- u64 *pte;
-
- if (domain->mode == PAGE_MODE_6_LEVEL)
- /* address space already 64 bit large */
- return false;
-
- pte = (void *)get_zeroed_page(gfp);
- if (!pte)
- return false;
-
- *pte = PM_LEVEL_PDE(domain->mode,
- virt_to_phys(domain->pt_root));
- domain->pt_root = pte;
- domain->mode += 1;
- domain->updated = true;
-
- return true;
-}
-
-static u64 *alloc_pte(struct protection_domain *domain,
- unsigned long address,
- int end_lvl,
- u64 **pte_page,
- gfp_t gfp)
-{
- u64 *pte, *page;
- int level;
-
- while (address > PM_LEVEL_SIZE(domain->mode))
- increase_address_space(domain, gfp);
-
- level = domain->mode - 1;
- pte = &domain->pt_root[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
-
- while (level > end_lvl) {
- if (!IOMMU_PTE_PRESENT(*pte)) {
- page = (u64 *)get_zeroed_page(gfp);
- if (!page)
- return NULL;
- *pte = PM_LEVEL_PDE(level, virt_to_phys(page));
- }
-
- level -= 1;
-
- pte = IOMMU_PTE_PAGE(*pte);
-
- if (pte_page && level == end_lvl)
- *pte_page = pte;
-
- pte = &pte[PM_LEVEL_INDEX(level, address)];
- }
-
- return pte;
-}
-
-/*
* This function fetches the PTE for a given address in the aperture
*/
static u64* dma_ops_get_pte(struct dma_ops_domain *dom,
--
1.6.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-27 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-27 13:55 [git pull] IOMMU updates for 2.6.33 Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 01/34] x86/amd-iommu: Separate internal interface definitions Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 02/34] x86/amd-iommu: Update copyright headers Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 03/34] x86/amd-iommu: Add an index field to struct amd_iommu Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 04/34] x86/amd-iommu: Add per IOMMU reference counting Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 05/34] x86/amd-iommu: Add function to complete a tlb flush Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 06/34] x86/amd-iommu: Make iommu_flush_pages aware of multiple IOMMUs Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 07/34] x86/amd-iommu: Use __iommu_flush_pages for tlb flushes Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 08/34] x86/amd-iommu: Remove iommu_flush_domain function Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 09/34] x86/amd-iommu: Implement protection domain list Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 10/34] x86/amd-iommu: Reimplement amd_iommu_flush_all_domains() Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 11/34] x86/amd-iommu: Reimplement flush_all_domains_on_iommu() Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 12/34] x86/amd-iommu: Make np-cache a global flag Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 13/34] x86/amd-iommu: Use check_device for amd_iommu_dma_supported Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 14/34] x86/amd-iommu: Use check_device in get_device_resources Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 15/34] x86/amd-iommu: Remove iommu parameter from dma_ops_domain_(un)map Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 16/34] x86/amd-iommu: Make alloc_new_range aware of multiple IOMMUs Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 17/34] x86/amd-iommu: Remove iommu parameter from __(un)map_single Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 18/34] x86/amd-iommu: Remove iommu specific handling from dma_ops path Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 19/34] x86/amd-iommu: Let domain_for_device handle aliases Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 20/34] x86/amd-iommu: Simplify get_device_resources() Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 21/34] x86/amd-iommu: Move find_protection_domain to helper functions Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 22/34] x86/amd-iommu: Use get_device_id and check_device where appropriate Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 23/34] x86/amd-iommu: Remove iommu parameter from dma_ops_domain_alloc Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 25/34] x86/amd-iommu: Rearrange dma_ops related functions Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 26/34] x86/amd-iommu: Remove support for domain sharing Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 27/34] x86/amd-iommu: Use dev->arch->iommu to store iommu related information Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 28/34] x86/amd-iommu: Add device bind reference counting Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 29/34] x86/amd-iommu: Keep devices per domain in a list Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 30/34] x86/amd-iommu: Cleanup attach/detach_device code Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 31/34] x86/amd-iommu: Introduce iommu_flush_device() function Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 32/34] x86/amd-iommu: Cleanup DTE flushing code Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 33/34] x86/amd-iommu: Move reset_iommu_command_buffer out of locked code Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 13:55 ` [PATCH 34/34] x86/amd-iommu: Remove amd_iommu_pd_table Joerg Roedel
2009-11-27 19:27 ` [git pull] IOMMU updates for 2.6.33 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1259330145-14865-25-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--to=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox