public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	utrace-devel <utrace-devel@redhat.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] In-kernel gdbstub based on utrace Infrastructure.
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:37:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259588232.20516.307.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091130131928.GC18879@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 18:49 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:

> This is suppose to be one of the interfaces to use utrace, i.e Allow
> gdb to use utrace features without having to change gdb itself.
> Though there are not enough features in this patch, intentions include
> support multi-threaded debugging, concurrent debugger support for same
> process, syscall tracing.
> 
> For Breakpoint support(not yet submitted to LKML), it would use
> execution out of line rather than the conventional inline-single
> stepping.
> 
> I guess Christoph, Roland and Frank would be able to explain in a better
> fashion the rational and advantages of this stub over convential gdb.

Hmm,. wouldn't it make much more sense to extend the current kgdb stub
to include userspace debugging, providing an all-in-one solution?

I think it would be much more powerful to be able to observe the full
software stack and not be limited by this user<->kernel barrier.

(Provided the user has sufficient privileges of course).


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-30 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-30 12:03 [RFC] [PATCH] In-kernel gdbstub based on utrace Infrastructure Srikar Dronamraju
2009-11-30 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-30 12:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2009-11-30 12:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-30 13:19       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2009-11-30 13:37         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-11-30 14:05           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2009-11-30 15:03           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-11-30 15:11             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-30 15:16             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-30 15:29               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-12-01 16:11                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-01 17:00                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-12-01 17:09                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-01 17:45                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-12-01 21:15                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-08 21:58                           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-12-10  7:41                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-10 15:08                               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-12-10 18:16                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-11  1:27                                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1259588232.20516.307.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox