The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch]  f83f9ac causes tasks running at MAX_PRIO
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:51:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1259772715.7052.39.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259762606.12870.16.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:03 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:46 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Funny thing though, INIT_TASK() sets everything at MAX_PRIO-20.
> 
> Right, because the init task will fork. But once a task becomes idle, it
> should never do anything (but service interrupts).


Seems it forks _as_ the idle thread..

        /*
         * Make us the idle thread. Technically, schedule() should not be
         * called from this thread, however somewhere below it might be,
         * but because we are the idle thread, we just pick up running again
         * when this runqueue becomes "idle".
         */
        init_idle(current, smp_processor_id());

        calc_load_update = jiffies + LOAD_FREQ;

        /*
         * During early bootup we pretend to be a normal task:
         */
        current->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;

..init task becomes the idle thread in sched_init().. gets to
rest_init(), forks with prio and normal_prio now at MAX_PRIO, but
static_prio still at NICE_0.

Peter's change looks OK unless I'm missing something.  Though...

static void pull_task(struct rq *src_rq, struct task_struct *p,
                      struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu)
{
        deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0);
        set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
        activate_task(this_rq, p, 0);
        /*
         * Note that idle threads have a prio of MAX_PRIO, for this test
         * to be always true for them.
         */
        check_preempt_curr(this_rq, p, 0);
}

..we have some O(1) comments for future generations to ponder.

	-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-02 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-29 13:23 [patch] f83f9ac causes tasks running at MAX_PRIO Mike Galbraith
2009-12-02 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-02 12:49   ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-03  1:25     ` Peter Williams
2009-12-03  1:44       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-03 10:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-02 14:03   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 16:51     ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-12-09  9:55   ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix task priority bug tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1259772715.7052.39.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox