From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
"K. Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] perf: Remove pointless union that wraps the hw breakpoint fields
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:38:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260095935.7818.258.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260084898-11686-3-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 08:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> It stands to anonymize a structure, but structures can already
> anonymize by themselves.
>
> Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: "K. Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 14 ++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index a61e4de..53230e9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -215,14 +215,12 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
> __u32 wakeup_watermark; /* bytes before wakeup */
> };
>
> - union {
> - struct { /* Hardware breakpoint info */
> - __u64 bp_addr;
> - __u32 bp_type;
> - __u32 bp_len;
> - __u64 __bp_reserved_1;
> - __u64 __bp_reserved_2;
> - };
> + struct { /* Hardware breakpoint info */
> + __u64 bp_addr;
> + __u32 bp_type;
> + __u32 bp_len;
> + __u64 __bp_reserved_1;
> + __u64 __bp_reserved_2;
> };
>
> __u32 __reserved_2;
So I'm a bit puzzled by the need for
- that structure to begin with
- specialized __bp reserves
Furthermore, you still got the packing wrong, leading to different
structure layout on 32 and 64 bit platforms,..
How about?
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 89098e3..5595154 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -215,17 +215,12 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
__u32 wakeup_watermark; /* bytes before wakeup */
};
- struct { /* Hardware breakpoint info */
- __u64 bp_addr;
- __u32 bp_type;
- __u32 bp_len;
- __u64 __bp_reserved_1;
- __u64 __bp_reserved_2;
- };
-
__u32 __reserved_2;
- __u64 __reserved_3;
+ /* Hardware breakpoint info */
+ __u64 bp_addr;
+ __u32 bp_type;
+ __u32 bp_len;
};
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-06 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-06 7:34 [GIT PULL] perf/hw-breakpoints: Various updates Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] hw-breakpoints: Add two reserved fields for future extensions Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf: Remove pointless union that wraps the hw breakpoint fields Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-07 1:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf: Remove unused struct perf_event::event_callback Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] hw-breakpoints: Drop callback and task parameters from modify helper Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] hw-breakpoints: Use overflow handler instead of the event callback Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf: Remove the "event" callback from perf events Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/perf: Exclude the debug stack from the callchains Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: Fixup wrong debug exception frame link in stacktraces Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: Fixup wrong irq " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:58 ` [GIT PULL] perf/hw-breakpoints: Various updates Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1260095935.7818.258.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox