public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	"K. Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] perf: Remove pointless union that wraps the hw breakpoint fields
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:38:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260095935.7818.258.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260084898-11686-3-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>

On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 08:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> It stands to anonymize a structure, but structures can already
> anonymize by themselves.
> 
> Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: "K. Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h |   14 ++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index a61e4de..53230e9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -215,14 +215,12 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>  		__u32		wakeup_watermark; /* bytes before wakeup   */
>  	};
>  
> -	union {
> -		struct { /* Hardware breakpoint info */
> -			__u64		bp_addr;
> -			__u32		bp_type;
> -			__u32		bp_len;
> -			__u64		__bp_reserved_1;
> -			__u64		__bp_reserved_2;
> -		};
> +	struct { /* Hardware breakpoint info */
> +		__u64		bp_addr;
> +		__u32		bp_type;
> +		__u32		bp_len;
> +		__u64		__bp_reserved_1;
> +		__u64		__bp_reserved_2;
>  	};
>  
>  	__u32			__reserved_2;

So I'm a bit puzzled by the need for
 - that structure to begin with
 - specialized __bp reserves

Furthermore, you still got the packing wrong, leading to different
structure layout on 32 and 64 bit platforms,..

How about?

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 89098e3..5595154 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -215,17 +215,12 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
 		__u32		wakeup_watermark; /* bytes before wakeup   */
 	};
 
-	struct { /* Hardware breakpoint info */
-		__u64		bp_addr;
-		__u32		bp_type;
-		__u32		bp_len;
-		__u64		__bp_reserved_1;
-		__u64		__bp_reserved_2;
-	};
-
 	__u32			__reserved_2;
 
-	__u64			__reserved_3;
+	/* Hardware breakpoint info */
+	__u64		bp_addr;
+	__u32		bp_type;
+	__u32		bp_len;
 };
 
 /*



  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-06 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-06  7:34 [GIT PULL] perf/hw-breakpoints: Various updates Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] hw-breakpoints: Add two reserved fields for future extensions Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf: Remove pointless union that wraps the hw breakpoint fields Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 10:38   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-07  1:46     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf: Remove unused struct perf_event::event_callback Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] hw-breakpoints: Drop callback and task parameters from modify helper Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] hw-breakpoints: Use overflow handler instead of the event callback Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf: Remove the "event" callback from perf events Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 10:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/perf: Exclude the debug stack from the callchains Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: Fixup wrong debug exception frame link in stacktraces Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: Fixup wrong irq " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06  7:58 ` [GIT PULL] perf/hw-breakpoints: Various updates Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1260095935.7818.258.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox