From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 17/18] rcu: Provide different lockdep classes for each flavor of RCU
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:02:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12609181611183-git-send-email-> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091215230213.GA9093@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Proposed for 2.6.34, not for inclusion.
In the past, all three flavors of RCU shared a common lockdep class.
This patch gives each of rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_bh(), and
rcu_read_lock_sched() their own lockdep classes to permit more precise
checking for read-holding the proper flavor of RCU.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/rcupdate.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 24440f4..723c564 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -78,14 +78,33 @@ extern void rcu_init(void);
} while (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
-# define rcu_read_acquire() \
- lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
+# define rcu_read_acquire() \
+ lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
# define rcu_read_release() lock_release(&rcu_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
-#else
-# define rcu_read_acquire() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release() do { } while (0)
-#endif
+
+extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
+# define rcu_read_acquire_bh() \
+ lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
+# define rcu_read_release_bh() lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+
+extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
+# define rcu_read_acquire_sched() \
+ lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_)
+# define rcu_read_release_sched() \
+ lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
+
+# define rcu_read_acquire() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_read_release() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_read_acquire_bh() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_read_release_bh() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_read_acquire_sched() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_read_release_sched() do { } while (0)
+
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
/**
* rcu_read_lock - mark the beginning of an RCU read-side critical section.
@@ -160,7 +179,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
{
__rcu_read_lock_bh();
__acquire(RCU_BH);
- rcu_read_acquire();
+ rcu_read_acquire_bh();
}
/*
@@ -170,7 +189,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
{
- rcu_read_release();
+ rcu_read_release_bh();
__release(RCU_BH);
__rcu_read_unlock_bh();
}
@@ -188,7 +207,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void)
{
preempt_disable();
__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
- rcu_read_acquire();
+ rcu_read_acquire_sched();
}
/* Used by lockdep and tracing: cannot be traced, cannot call lockdep. */
@@ -205,7 +224,7 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void)
{
- rcu_read_release();
+ rcu_read_release_sched();
__release(RCU_SCHED);
preempt_enable();
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
index 9b7fd47..033cb55 100644
--- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
+++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
@@ -50,6 +50,16 @@ static struct lock_class_key rcu_lock_key;
struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map =
STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("rcu_read_lock", &rcu_lock_key);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lock_map);
+
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_bh_lock_key;
+struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map =
+ STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("rcu_read_lock_bh", &rcu_bh_lock_key);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_bh_lock_map);
+
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_sched_lock_key;
+struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map =
+ STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT("rcu_read_lock_sched", &rcu_sched_lock_key);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_sched_lock_map);
#endif
/*
--
1.5.2.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-15 23:02 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/18] rcu: simplify race conditions, add checking Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/18] rcu: adjust force_quiescent_state() locking, step 1 Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: adjust force_quiescent_state() locking, step 2 Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/18] rcu: prohibit starting new grace periods while forcing quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/18] rcu: eliminate local variable signaled from force_quiescent_state() Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/18] rcu: eliminate local variable lastcomp " Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/18] rcu: eliminate second argument of rcu_process_dyntick() Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/18] rcu: eliminate rcu_process_dyntick() return value Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/18] rcu: remove leg of force_quiescent_state() switch statement Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/18] rcu: remove redundant grace-period check Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/18] rcu: make force_quiescent_state() start grace period if needed Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/18] rcu: add force_quiescent_state() testing to rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/18] rcu: make MAINTAINERS file match new RCU reality Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16 0:53 ` Josh Triplett
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/18] rcu: add debug check for too many rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/18] rcu: lockdep check for exiting to user space as RCU reader Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 15:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/18] rcu: give different levels of the rcu_node hierarchy distinct lockdep names Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16 0:59 ` Josh Triplett
2009-12-16 1:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 15:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 16/18] rcu: make lockdep aware of SRCU read-side critical sections Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-15 23:02 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-12-15 23:02 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 18/18] rcu: add primitives to check for RCU " Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16 1:04 ` Josh Triplett
2009-12-16 2:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12609181611183-git-send-email- \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox