From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS lockdep lock misordering mmap_sem<->i_mutex_key with 2.6.32-git1
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:09:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260968991.3219.57.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091216005308.GB3622@basil.fritz.box>
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 01:53 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > If you want to work around the problem rather than going for something
>
> I am mostly interested in making the ugly warning on my systems
> go away, preferably without breaking anything in the process.
> Whatever works.
>
> > like Peter's split up of the mmap() callback, then I'd suggest changing
> > to using nfs_revalidate_mapping_nolock() instead. The fact that we are
> > seeing these lock misordering warnings is proof that the call to
> > nfs_revalidate_mapping() is not always a no-op.
>
> I would say the interesting question is if there is really a expectation
> that mmap does this kind of synchronization?
Usually people who set the 'noac' mount flag will expect these syscalls
to act as synchronisation points.
Typically, their applications will be using some kind of locking scheme
that does not require POSIX or BSD locks to be set. For instance, they
may synchronise by means of a token passed through a socket (common in
MPI iirc).
> Why in mmap, not somewhere else?
We do the same thing in the read() and write() syscalls.
Cheers
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 11:59 NFS lockdep lock misordering mmap_sem<->i_mutex_key with 2.6.32-git1 Andi Kleen
2009-12-07 12:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-07 13:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-07 17:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-15 22:21 ` Al Viro
2009-12-15 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-15 23:54 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-16 0:09 ` Al Viro
2009-12-16 13:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-23 16:32 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-16 0:53 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-16 13:09 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2009-12-16 15:57 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-16 0:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-12-16 0:48 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1260968991.3219.57.camel@localhost \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox