From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756913AbZLUQ5V (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:57:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756851AbZLUQ5Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:57:16 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:55234 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756904AbZLUQ5M (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:57:12 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc1+ bisected (?) s2ram regression From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Carlos R. Mafra" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20091221164608.GA3909@Pilar.aei.mpg.de> References: <20091221164608.GA3909@Pilar.aei.mpg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:56:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1261414580.4314.181.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 17:46 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > After 2.6.33-rc1 suspend to RAM (echo mem > /sys/power/state) stopped working > on my Vaio. Plain 2.6.33-rc1 is fine. http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/88